Personal contract hire and in stock too. Not sure how much of a deal it is.
Engine doesn't seem punchy considering size of car but it comes with some decent kit.
6 months upfront at £1511
23 months at £252
£180 initial fee
Top comments
Mire Mare
17 Feb 1615#10
Have had this vehicle (Auto) on a personal lease for almost two years (ends in May) I paid almost 9k in total (based on 10k PA) and at the time it was a sweet deal!
Great family wagon well built, superb engine (55-65 Mpg) and according to the service indicator it will go back before having to go to the expense of getting it serviced, however I have had to replace the front two tyres at 11k! (£300) there is still plenty of tread on the rear so on reflection I should have rotated the wheels at around 8k and probably would not have had to replace any rubber. I have also had to top it up four times with 5L of "Adblue" at £15 a pop (Amazon) I dread to think how much they would charge at the main dealer.
For those who get it leasing is a cracking way of getting into a brand new vehicle which you may very well have never been able to afford using traditional means. My rule of thumb is the total you pay for the lease period should always be less than what you would loose in that same period should you have purchased the car from new.
In this case an Audi A6 Avant is around £35k new, after 24 months it's worth around £22k so a personal loss of around £13k or lease it for £7.5k for the same period!
Talk about dead money!
MM
Besford
20 Feb 168#30
As usual, the error in so many of the calculations being made on depreciation is to base that on list price; very unlikely you'd have to pay anywhere near that if buying this or most other cars new.
loofer to savingbritainmoney
18 Feb 164#22
Not sure how old your Astra is but the fact you got it for 600 is clear indication of how rapidly it depreciated to get to that point.
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
topss
17 Feb 164#11
Personally it has the 'I could own this car outright, but I'm not stupid to waste £s on a depreciating asset, so will pay for it accordingly' look.
Anyway, we have one of these on a business lease. It's a great car. Slightly firm ride, but very practical and imo looks nice and is a nice cabin to be in, either driving it or as a passenger.
All comments (68)
loofer
16 Feb 163#1
8k miles per annum limit
arma_gera
16 Feb 161#2
8k limit...
10111010101011
16 Feb 16#3
6+23 not 24..
mcintg
17 Feb 16#4
This would be the new Euro 6 engine, I have one in my Passat, it's a very good performer, surprisingly punchy and without the emissions story associated with the Euro 5.
loofer to mcintg
17 Feb 16#8
I'm guessing the a6 avant will be heavier... Haven't checked stats though.
Assuming an avant buyer is lugging some stuff round too. Gota say it looks the part though
taker920
17 Feb 16#5
Nice deal
MisterSkinflint
17 Feb 16#6
That's a lot of car for the money.
cheeky_chops
17 Feb 161#7
parkers lease search shows their best price as £340pm with £2k deposit so this is a deal.
savingbritainmoney
17 Feb 16#9
what part does it look? has it hot the I don't and never will own this car look?
Mire Mare
17 Feb 1615#10
Have had this vehicle (Auto) on a personal lease for almost two years (ends in May) I paid almost 9k in total (based on 10k PA) and at the time it was a sweet deal!
Great family wagon well built, superb engine (55-65 Mpg) and according to the service indicator it will go back before having to go to the expense of getting it serviced, however I have had to replace the front two tyres at 11k! (£300) there is still plenty of tread on the rear so on reflection I should have rotated the wheels at around 8k and probably would not have had to replace any rubber. I have also had to top it up four times with 5L of "Adblue" at £15 a pop (Amazon) I dread to think how much they would charge at the main dealer.
For those who get it leasing is a cracking way of getting into a brand new vehicle which you may very well have never been able to afford using traditional means. My rule of thumb is the total you pay for the lease period should always be less than what you would loose in that same period should you have purchased the car from new.
In this case an Audi A6 Avant is around £35k new, after 24 months it's worth around £22k so a personal loss of around £13k or lease it for £7.5k for the same period!
Talk about dead money!
MM
riskyb to Mire Mare
20 Feb 16#26
Why did you need to put adblue in it?
stethorn1980 to Mire Mare
21 Feb 16#48
Have you ever had any issues returning cars ? Looking for first ever lease as need a large family car, had almost decided on one but been reading about charges when returning, etc and how companies make a fortune of charges , etc.
topss
17 Feb 164#11
Personally it has the 'I could own this car outright, but I'm not stupid to waste £s on a depreciating asset, so will pay for it accordingly' look.
Anyway, we have one of these on a business lease. It's a great car. Slightly firm ride, but very practical and imo looks nice and is a nice cabin to be in, either driving it or as a passenger.
savingbritainmoney
17 Feb 16#12
So in 2 years would this car be worth £7500 less?
topss
17 Feb 16#13
A quick look on Autotrader seems to suggest it will. Apart from that, I'm pretty certain my father and his accountant wouldn't be leasing if it didn't have some financial benefit :laughing:
But that's not the whole story. Assuming you're swapping cars every couple of years and even if you can afford to buy outright, leasing can make sense - even if you don't save significant amounts. Hassle free motoring for the duration of the lease, no headaches when trying to sell it and, especially for a business, there are other benefits.
I'm sure there are people out there who lease because they would like to drive something they can't afford outright (personally not my mindset) and that's their personal decision and why not, if you can afford the payments. But from a totally financial point of view, most decent lease deals will help you save money compared to buying/selling every couple of years.
wadeon
17 Feb 161#14
Ridgeway Audi in Oxford beat the price on the A4 deal posted a month ago by over a grand, so may be worth contacting them first if anyone is considering this!
loofer
17 Feb 16#15
even more less... if that double negative makes sense
volksdub
17 Feb 16#16
In 2 years it will be worth 12k - 14k less.
robodan918
17 Feb 161#17
The day you drive it off the lot it loses the 20% markup it has in the showroom
So yes, it's more than reasonable to expect a HIGHLY CONSERVATIVE 7500 depreciation over 2 years on this car. Likely it will be more.
tl;dr this lease is a rocking deal. With a car you're always losing money (it's a depreciating asset). Much better to lose 7500/27.93% over 2 years than 42.40%(est 11,382). Spend that extra 3882 on something nice for your kids. Spend whatever's left over on that thing you've been waiting to buy yourself :wink:
volksdub
17 Feb 16#18
I bought my A6 S-line at 2 years old for 20k with 26k on the clock. Which was 34k new so it lost 14k in the 2 years. If I wanted a new plate car I would deffo go for a deal like this.
fishmaster to volksdub
21 Feb 16#36
A £14K loss in two years :disappointed: Doesn't make good business sense to me to buy new, I'd be crying. I imagine you still lost quite a bit on the £20K you put down?
savingbritainmoney
17 Feb 163#19
Each to their own I guess, I've had my 600 pound vauxhall for almost 4 years and not having to put any expensive parts on (any work needed is done by me) so not all cars depreciate rapidly.
I'm happy for people to think I can't afford an expensive car some people on the other hand think a car reflects on how successful a person is.
loofer to savingbritainmoney
18 Feb 164#22
Not sure how old your Astra is but the fact you got it for 600 is clear indication of how rapidly it depreciated to get to that point.
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
loofer to savingbritainmoney
18 Feb 16#23
Not sure how old your Astra is but the fact you got it for 600 is clear indication of how rapidly it depreciated to get to that point.
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
solsurf
17 Feb 16#20
I've just been trying to convince my wife that the a4 avant at 173 per month but it's not big enough so this looks like a great deal
darecy
17 Feb 16#21
I need 10k pa
savingbritainmoney
18 Feb 16#24
sorry my bad I mean it hasn't deprecated rapidly in the time I've had it.
loofer
18 Feb 16#25
I knew you meant that, I was just pointing out that once you get into the sub £1000 range then depreciation reeaally slows down. As long as the car runs something then you'll always get something for it.
Admittedly that could be £300 which is 50% of what you paid (even less when you factor in parts), but in monetary terms, a car depreciating only £300 after 6 years is great.
It just can't be compared to a new car though
loofer
20 Feb 16#27
My thoughts too. Thought that only went in big commercial vehicles.
Besford
20 Feb 16#28
You thought wrong. Many current cars (Euro 6) need adblue.
pigeon84
20 Feb 16#29
Lots of high output diesel cars are now using selective catalytic reduction to meet Euro VI NOX limits.
Hmmm wonder why they felt the need to rename it AdBlue?
"Hey, I just filled my A6 with urea!"
Besford
20 Feb 168#30
As usual, the error in so many of the calculations being made on depreciation is to base that on list price; very unlikely you'd have to pay anywhere near that if buying this or most other cars new.
un1eash to Besford
20 Feb 161#32
I've seen the paper work on my next lease a £38k 5 series, cost to the lease company was under £28k. I was offered a similar PCP deal so there are massive savings to be had on models like the A6 and 5 series which are due replacements.
This is a bargain of a deal though.
benngoose
20 Feb 16#31
I have also had to top it up four times with 5L of "Adblue" at £15 a pop (Amazon) I dread to think how much they would charge at the main dealer.
£12 for 10L at Aberdeen Audi and £11 for the same size at BP and Shell garages so Amazon not the cheapest.
Mire Mare to benngoose
21 Feb 16#45
Thanks for the heads up, will check out the local garage next time I refuel, Audi dealer about £10 worth of derv away so dosent make financial sense.
Not sure why I never checked eBay before but there are various sellers supplying 20ltr's for £20, including FREE shipping!
MM
JJJZ
20 Feb 161#33
I like this deal and im tempted as for me having my money not tied up in a depreciating asset is better value. Not to forget although small even savings interest can be offset against it. However I reckonIncan make my money work better nonetheless.
Slightly different note i was tempted to try buying through broadspeed a car keeping just under 12 months doing around 8k miles and seeing what i could sell it for. Then rinse and repeat. I had a theory you would come out better than a lease depending on car.
Also again on another note this will depreciate more soon as its due the new version to bring it inline with the rest of the new range.
I would suggest since it's impossible for you not to be judged by some people about your choice of car, that you simple say 'your opinion regarding my choice of car is none of my business'. That sentence alone will bring you peace :smiley:
fishmaster
21 Feb 16#35
Seems a really good price, but as an owner of an inferior Golf MK6 to the car in this deal, I still couldn't go from petrol to diesel ever again, my car's engine is just so quiet and it's probalby not even the quietest petrol car, going from that to a clattering diesel, nah can't do it, it doesn't matter how refined a diesel is, you notice the engine noise if you've had a petrol car before it. Most lease deals are diesel as it makes sense, for private use I stick to petrol.
solsurf to fishmaster
21 Feb 161#41
there's a great deal at select leasing for the new 1.4 turbo petrol a4 avant at 173 a month
MazingerZ to fishmaster
21 Feb 16#53
Try an S350 diesel. Woooooooooweeee
Naturehermit
21 Feb 16#37
Remember Audi was the worst performer using defeat devices from Volkswagen. Audi is technically not even German, it's a Chinese crap with German label.
I have Audi's through the years and have seen quality go down, but do punish VW for their instrasagience. Do not buy Audi or any VW lease or otherwise. There are plenty of choices
Emeye
21 Feb 16#38
I was interested in the A4 Avant deals too but I need a wider car as I have 3 kids. Thanks for posting OP.
eightace
21 Feb 16#39
Liking this thread a lot. Our mileage was way over the 8k with the deal here but may well drop soon after a move so could be looking at this.
InAFalsetto
21 Feb 16#40
Leasing is for lazy people that don't wash their cars themselves, service regularly or just keep things mint in general.
Every car I have owned I have had no problem selling as I kept my cars in excellent condition. I'd put them on auto trader or piston heads and they would sell within 2 weeks.
On that note why would I buy this car new? I'd get it used from a similar owner who takes care of his car at a fraction of the retail cost.
Deaa to InAFalsetto
21 Feb 161#52
I would have though people look after a lease more if anything. We all know about the silly amounts they charge for damage and if you have a brand new car like this then your usually a bit of a show off which means you will keep it clean. Buy a 7 year old Skoda octavia an your probably not going to care how your car looks.
Also most people don't have cash to buy their cars. I wouldn't have 20k to buy one used so I'd have to finance it which would probably mean paying more like 25k for a two year old car which another 2 years down the line runs the risk of developing faults that could but me thousands out of pocket.
These lease deals work great for some people. Don't assume everyone is the same as you or worse a person if they arnt like you.
sjaddy
21 Feb 161#42
But on drive the deal you can get a brand new one for £28k which is £8k cheaper than the RRP. That will surely factor into some of the lease v new decisions. If you take the fact after 24 months the car is worth £22k second hand then you have only lost £6k in depreciation in those 2 years. Compared to the £7.5k for the rental?
also owning the car means you don't have to worry about the mileage you are doing each year. I have a new job which suddenly went from doing under 10 miles a day (driving to the train station) to now doing 140 miles a day, being tied into a lease for 8k miles per year would be no use.
grimboj2 to sjaddy
21 Feb 161#43
Still don't get leasing. So if you only do 40 miles per day on average and must have a brand new car every 2 years, choosing cars that depreciate faster than the lease, then you're getting a good deal?
riskyb
21 Feb 16#44
Interesting. I didn't realise cars were doing this now. Sounds like another nail in the coffin for diesel.
lukepearson9216
21 Feb 16#46
That's a cracking deal and a lot of car for the money. I have a 2014 saloon version with the same engine, which is very good and doesn't feel underpowered at all.
sofiasar
21 Feb 16#47
you can buy a used a3 12 reg for this much.
not being funny
Tonto
21 Feb 16#49
The issue with people arguing that you shouldn't lease as you can get £10k off the rrp is that that would only be possible if you paid upfront wouldn't it? If you haven't got that much cash then you're not going to get discount on the rrp if you need a hp agreement
sjaddy to Tonto
21 Feb 16#51
that is true - but then I was always bought up to only buy things if I can afford them (with the exception of a house!). Guess I am in the minority now that I would be happy driving around in something I owned outright rather than have to worry in two years time whether I have the money to then take another lease out
fastmedium to Tonto
21 Feb 16#54
The discounts are based on you taking out PCP and include dealer deposit contribution
Besford to Tonto
21 Feb 16#56
They would prefer that you took some form of finance as dealer then takes a cut, so no it won't get you a worse deal.
oddballjamie to Tonto
21 Feb 161#61
Cash is no longer king with dealerships, they get commission when they sell finance along with the car.
The ideal scenario is to take the finance and clear it within 14 days keeping the discount or lease of course.
Tonto
21 Feb 16#50
hukdbargain
21 Feb 16#55
Try 11 inches woohhoooooo.
ZoroBandit
21 Feb 16#57
How lease companies making profit? Lets say car worth 34k, after 2 years car worth 20k, and you paid lets say 8k for it, it means someone loses 6k? why, I do not understand ?
lukepearson9216 to ZoroBandit
21 Feb 16#58
The lease company would pay much less than the rrp, they probably pay something like 24k.
sm-1991
21 Feb 16#59
My brother is paying £210 + vat for 10k miles, business lease only.
DudleyGuy
21 Feb 16#60
Cold.
I bought my XR3I for £1000, added a new exhaust, and in car media total cost £500. It's now worth at least £2,000, so I've made money, and drive around in a performance classic car.
Why lease? Waste of money.
wrcallar to DudleyGuy
21 Feb 162#62
Oh bore off.
HarpoonJoe to DudleyGuy
21 Feb 16#65
no more so than a holiday, bigger tv, dishwasher, games consoles or eating out. If it's about saving money then you have to ask what you're saving for? as to the xr3i vs the a6, or any modern day car for that matter, I wouldn't want to be involved in an accident in the old ford. There's more to driving than doing it on the cheap.
mcintg
21 Feb 16#63
I'd have to agree with this, people seem to think that if you can plonk yourself down at a dealers and proclaim you have cash you will get an amazing deal.. The dealers are more interested in selling you the credit deals as that's where they make their money
oddballjamie
21 Feb 164#64
My Dad and myself have both bought cars recently and the moment you mention cash they lose interest.
Best way we found was to answer the question "How would you be funding the purchase?" with "Whatever gets us the lowest price."
DudleyGuy
21 Feb 16#66
Are you serious? "Old Ford" This is a classic sports car, and will only go up in value.!
HarpoonJoe
21 Feb 16#67
The point still remains that it has antiquated safety measures, has no warranty, and is going to take a lot of time, effort, and money to keep it on the road and even more so to keep it in tip top classic condition for the sake of investment. AND the xr3i wasn't the best of cars even when it was new. My mate had one and the interior fell apart with the lightest use. Your car might be a classic, it might be a great hobby for an enthusiast, it might even be a good investment BUT that doesn't necessarily mean it's a sensible purchase for someone looking for a good hassle free family car.
I have no issue with your choice of vehicle, you have your own set of priorities. But to claim that as a waste of money is just silly and I suspect you too "waste" plenty of your own money on things that you like and can afford. Like I said different people have different priorities, and for someone looking for a lease deal on a large estate this is a pretty good deal.
As it happens I had a school reunion last night. One of the guys didn't make it as he had a serious accident only the week before, in some old classic car (no idea what exactly he was driving to be honest but he has been into his classic motors since we were in school). Anyway, looks like they were considering having to amputate one of his legs from the knee down :/
nickyjg
17 Mar 16#68
This deal still seems to be running. Was initially very interested in a Skoda Superb estate, but nothing happening with a worthwhile variant. Can get a Q7 cheaper, it seems! Missed out on the recent Alltrack £3k odd 24month glitch deal by hours. Gutted,but no point crying over spilt milk!
I note the Alltracks can still be had on a relatively good deal of about £5.5k for 24 months or the equivalent over 36 months. I want to stop running a Citroen C6 and Kangoo van, and go for a nice estate. Single vehicle for all duties. The rugged Alltrack would have been ideal.
Or would this A6 deal definitely be a better bet at £7.5k over 24 months? Certainly would soften the blow coming from the luxury of the big C6.
Opening post
Engine doesn't seem punchy considering size of car but it comes with some decent kit.
6 months upfront at £1511
23 months at £252
£180 initial fee
Top comments
Great family wagon well built, superb engine (55-65 Mpg) and according to the service indicator it will go back before having to go to the expense of getting it serviced, however I have had to replace the front two tyres at 11k! (£300) there is still plenty of tread on the rear so on reflection I should have rotated the wheels at around 8k and probably would not have had to replace any rubber. I have also had to top it up four times with 5L of "Adblue" at £15 a pop (Amazon) I dread to think how much they would charge at the main dealer.
For those who get it leasing is a cracking way of getting into a brand new vehicle which you may very well have never been able to afford using traditional means. My rule of thumb is the total you pay for the lease period should always be less than what you would loose in that same period should you have purchased the car from new.
In this case an Audi A6 Avant is around £35k new, after 24 months it's worth around £22k so a personal loss of around £13k or lease it for £7.5k for the same period!
Talk about dead money!
MM
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
Anyway, we have one of these on a business lease. It's a great car. Slightly firm ride, but very practical and imo looks nice and is a nice cabin to be in, either driving it or as a passenger.
All comments (68)
Assuming an avant buyer is lugging some stuff round too. Gota say it looks the part though
Great family wagon well built, superb engine (55-65 Mpg) and according to the service indicator it will go back before having to go to the expense of getting it serviced, however I have had to replace the front two tyres at 11k! (£300) there is still plenty of tread on the rear so on reflection I should have rotated the wheels at around 8k and probably would not have had to replace any rubber. I have also had to top it up four times with 5L of "Adblue" at £15 a pop (Amazon) I dread to think how much they would charge at the main dealer.
For those who get it leasing is a cracking way of getting into a brand new vehicle which you may very well have never been able to afford using traditional means. My rule of thumb is the total you pay for the lease period should always be less than what you would loose in that same period should you have purchased the car from new.
In this case an Audi A6 Avant is around £35k new, after 24 months it's worth around £22k so a personal loss of around £13k or lease it for £7.5k for the same period!
Talk about dead money!
MM
Anyway, we have one of these on a business lease. It's a great car. Slightly firm ride, but very practical and imo looks nice and is a nice cabin to be in, either driving it or as a passenger.
But that's not the whole story. Assuming you're swapping cars every couple of years and even if you can afford to buy outright, leasing can make sense - even if you don't save significant amounts. Hassle free motoring for the duration of the lease, no headaches when trying to sell it and, especially for a business, there are other benefits.
I'm sure there are people out there who lease because they would like to drive something they can't afford outright (personally not my mindset) and that's their personal decision and why not, if you can afford the payments. But from a totally financial point of view, most decent lease deals will help you save money compared to buying/selling every couple of years.
So yes, it's more than reasonable to expect a HIGHLY CONSERVATIVE 7500 depreciation over 2 years on this car. Likely it will be more.
RRP with VAT and dealer screw-you tax is 26,845
(source: https://www.audi.co.uk/content/dam/audi/production/PDF/UsedCars/Refresh/A6/A6%20-%20Sept%2006.pdf page 21)
a 7500 depreciation = 27.93% of the car's initial purchase price.
Using a depreciation calculator online http://www.whatcar.com/car-depreciation-calculator/results?makeId=5289&modelVersionId=6616&editionId=44891
Depreciation is estimated at 42.40% over the first 2 years, although it should be noted that their RRP shows as higher than the audi documentation. Still, this curve is very similar for all A6 models.
tl;dr this lease is a rocking deal. With a car you're always losing money (it's a depreciating asset). Much better to lose 7500/27.93% over 2 years than 42.40%(est 11,382). Spend that extra 3882 on something nice for your kids. Spend whatever's left over on that thing you've been waiting to buy yourself :wink:
I'm happy for people to think I can't afford an expensive car some people on the other hand think a car reflects on how successful a person is.
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
I drive a 2001 car and try to do most work myself (removed starter motor earlier this week) however I equally appreciate that some people prefer to drive a newer and more well equipped car but don't see the sense in a big outlay.
Doesn't mean I should judge them just like I wouldn't want to be judged for the car I drive
Admittedly that could be £300 which is 50% of what you paid (even less when you factor in parts), but in monetary terms, a car depreciating only £300 after 6 years is great.
It just can't be compared to a new car though
Hmmm wonder why they felt the need to rename it AdBlue?
"Hey, I just filled my A6 with urea!"
This is a bargain of a deal though.
£12 for 10L at Aberdeen Audi and £11 for the same size at BP and Shell garages so Amazon not the cheapest.
Not sure why I never checked eBay before but there are various sellers supplying 20ltr's for £20, including FREE shipping!
MM
Slightly different note i was tempted to try buying through broadspeed a car keeping just under 12 months doing around 8k miles and seeing what i could sell it for. Then rinse and repeat. I had a theory you would come out better than a lease depending on car.
Also again on another note this will depreciate more soon as its due the new version to bring it inline with the rest of the new range.
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2017-a6-set-standard-large-audis
I have Audi's through the years and have seen quality go down, but do punish VW for their instrasagience. Do not buy Audi or any VW lease or otherwise. There are plenty of choices
Every car I have owned I have had no problem selling as I kept my cars in excellent condition. I'd put them on auto trader or piston heads and they would sell within 2 weeks.
On that note why would I buy this car new? I'd get it used from a similar owner who takes care of his car at a fraction of the retail cost.
Also most people don't have cash to buy their cars. I wouldn't have 20k to buy one used so I'd have to finance it which would probably mean paying more like 25k for a two year old car which another 2 years down the line runs the risk of developing faults that could but me thousands out of pocket.
These lease deals work great for some people. Don't assume everyone is the same as you or worse a person if they arnt like you.
also owning the car means you don't have to worry about the mileage you are doing each year. I have a new job which suddenly went from doing under 10 miles a day (driving to the train station) to now doing 140 miles a day, being tied into a lease for 8k miles per year would be no use.
not being funny
The ideal scenario is to take the finance and clear it within 14 days keeping the discount or lease of course.
I bought my XR3I for £1000, added a new exhaust, and in car media total cost £500. It's now worth at least £2,000, so I've made money, and drive around in a performance classic car.
Why lease? Waste of money.
Best way we found was to answer the question "How would you be funding the purchase?" with "Whatever gets us the lowest price."
I have no issue with your choice of vehicle, you have your own set of priorities. But to claim that as a waste of money is just silly and I suspect you too "waste" plenty of your own money on things that you like and can afford. Like I said different people have different priorities, and for someone looking for a lease deal on a large estate this is a pretty good deal.
As it happens I had a school reunion last night. One of the guys didn't make it as he had a serious accident only the week before, in some old classic car (no idea what exactly he was driving to be honest but he has been into his classic motors since we were in school). Anyway, looks like they were considering having to amputate one of his legs from the knee down :/
I note the Alltracks can still be had on a relatively good deal of about £5.5k for 24 months or the equivalent over 36 months. I want to stop running a Citroen C6 and Kangoo van, and go for a nice estate. Single vehicle for all duties. The rugged Alltrack would have been ideal.
Or would this A6 deal definitely be a better bet at £7.5k over 24 months? Certainly would soften the blow coming from the luxury of the big C6.