I have done a lot of research and I know people fear these because "they can not be removed in an emergency" but this is not true.
If you are into science more than bling then maybe you will like them?
--
Just noticed you can get buy one get one half price also.
"Special Offer - Buy One, Get The Cheapest One Half Price"
Top comments
Gimble to spannerzone
10 Jan 1658#2
It's for myself, I am not materialist and I like the properties of the metal (weighty, almost scratch proof, dark silver appearance). I would still want it even if it was equivalently priced with platinum.
My fiancée was given a palladium engagement ring with a sapphire, again because I liked the properties of the metal over platinum and the color of the stone.
Maybe some people measure their love with the size of the rock?
spannerzone
10 Jan 1613#1
Your bride/husband to be is a very lucky person
yorinul
10 Jan 1613#9
"Special Offer - Buy One, Get The Cheapest One Half Price"
Even bigamists like a bargain!
os5889
10 Jan 1612#3
My fiancees ring was chosen based on the properties she liked...
Latest comments (62)
Jetpac
10 Jan 162#14
Dont buy it, I had a tungsten carbide ring from Greed.
Im pretty sure they contain cobalt which leaches out and stains the ring.
Get titanium instead.
Gimble to Jetpac
10 Jan 161#23
The super cheap ones from unknown sellers (ebay etc) usually have cobalt, I am hoping that these coming from a more reputable seller will be nickle carbon compound which is the best for tungsten rings.
Bendown to Jetpac
11 Jan 16#35
Nothing worse than having a stained ring
blady to Jetpac
17 Jan 16#62
Thanks!
Aspman77
12 Jan 16#61
Tungsten rings are pretty weighty. I doubt Joe Bloggs in the street could tell the difference from Platinum by holding them.
Titanium rings are much much lighter then any of the other metals. And despite what's said in the marketing, Ti rings get scratched pretty easily. But that makes it look more like a precious metal if anything since Tungsten can look a little too immaculate.
monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 16#59
Tungsten Carbide density is 15.63g/cm3
950 Platinum density is 20.1g/cm3
One is a prized precious metal, and the other makes tooling tips...
In pure form, Gold and Tungsten are within 1% of each other (because Tungsten is more tightly packed in its crystalline structure), but you're unlikely to see either in pure form for rings.
Shengis to monkeyhanger75
12 Jan 161#60
Which wasn't actually the question I asked, or maybe not as full an answer as you would like to give :stuck_out_tongue::wink:
At the end of the day I think my question is pretty meaningless in the real world. If you were to blindfold somebody and place before them platinum,gold,TC and titanium rings I think the titanium would be the only identifiable one. The rest would all weigh roughly the same subjectively.
Shengis
11 Jan 16#58
So you're saying Tungsten is light compared to Gold?
monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 16#57
It isn't theory at all. True a pure 24k gold ring is a huge rarity as it is just too soft in its pure form, but most precious metal rings have a decent % of the total alloy content as the primary precious metal.
Platinum is typically 95% pure with Iridium making up the difference to harden it up, a Platinum ring (950 grade) or 18k + Gold has a very noticeable density to it that will set it apart from a much lighter Titanium, Palladium or Tungsten ring.
Unless you're going to alloy Tungsten 50:50 with depleted Uranium (or something just as heavy) or Gold 50:50 with Lithium (or something ridiculously light), there will always be quite a weight difference between the kind of rings you're talking about and something made from a precious metal.
EazyDuz
11 Jan 16#56
Perfect deal for the working class
Kevvo77
11 Jan 16#55
Platinum and Palladium rings scratch up pretty bad so just because you're spending £300+ don't expect the ring to look new after a couple of months of wear.
And if she doesn't like it, I have another 19 to go :smiley:
Aspman77
11 Jan 161#53
I had one of these JG Tungsten rings the weight was nice but it was so shiny it looked a bit like chromed plastic.
I've also tried a cobalt ring which I really liked but the sizing was off so it went back.
I have my real wedding ring is palladium but I've a habit of losing things so most days I wear a cheap (also JG) titanium ring. A few people have assumed it is a large platinum ring no one else has ever noticed it's not the real ring. Just shows it's not really worth paying out for expensive metals unless it personally means something to you to do that.
nosliwmatt
11 Jan 16#52
Tungsten is very strong yes but tarnishes badly, i had a tungsten wedding ring 8 months later we had to replace it with titanium because the tungsten tarnished that badly it looked awful
finnmaccool
10 Jan 167#5
Cause she's worthless
pasheast to finnmaccool
10 Jan 165#15
So you didn't quite manage to get all the way to comment #2, then?
Rudedawg to finnmaccool
11 Jan 16#51
:confused:
someguy003
11 Jan 16#50
My understanding of metals is that most are alloys. These are not pure palladium, platinum, or tungsten carbide rings- other things are added. So your weight theory is not correct. To change the weight- simply add or remove the accompanying alloys or change to a different alloy mix. As for looks, this too can be affected by the alloy mix as well. You are talking about wedding rings like they are women. A few women are slim and attractive and look like a models, and a man would not have a problem marrying them. But most do not- this is something cannot be changed.
The ring has to last the rest of your life, £6.44 it's not going to be long is it, you're probably not even going to get the oral
coventgamer to someguy003
11 Jan 16#46
they like to take your money
better going to the local brothel
monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 16#43
If this is all you're willing to pay on a wedding band, might as well buy a brass Olive from your local plumbers merchant for 15p and save even more.
GDB2222 to monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 162#45
I'd rather have a cheap wedding and spend the saving on buying a home. In fact, that was what my wife and I chose when we married in 1980, and we have not regretted that decision.
They are exceptionally high quality, has a nice weight and is pretty much impossible to scratch being 4x stronger than titanium but be aware that this metal means that you'll never be able to resize the ring.
cakepanda
11 Jan 162#42
Before you buy, there is one significant negative to a tungsten carbide ring - they are almost impossible to remove in an emergency situation, eg if you damage your hand in an accident and the fingers swell up. The cutting equipment which A+E or the fire services have will not get through this ring. They have to be compressed in order to fracture the metal.
monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 16#41
For poorer.....
monkeyhanger75
11 Jan 16#40
Looking at them and wearing them. The weight alone will be a giveaway.
zippypants
11 Jan 16#39
I suppose it's alright if you want to let the guest house owner where you are going away for a licentious
weekend think you are married... No wait that was in the 1950's and 1960's :confused:
FREEZIN WOLF
11 Jan 16#38
Theres a name for people like you...
... Women
FREEZIN WOLF
11 Jan 16#37
I can never think of Tungsten Carbide drills without thinking of >>>THIS<<<
FREEZIN WOLF
11 Jan 161#36
This blokes getting married!
The chances of finding out what condition the ring is in are just behind his chances of plaiting fog or knitting yoghurt.
willdennington
11 Jan 16#34
I chose Tungsten Carbide as my wedding band over 7 years ago, I love the colour and weight of the metal. Think it cost me just under £50, price wasn't particularly crucial so I could've spent far more but had no desire to. I got platinum for the other half though, don't think she would've appreciated a ring with a 2 figure price lol :smile:
benlondon
11 Jan 16#33
how kind of you to take her opinion into account, she must be a very lucky lady
mercutio98uk
11 Jan 16#32
Looked into tungsten a while ago. Interestingly (or "interestingly," depending on your mindset), it's a neutron reflector, so one of a few materials that can cause radioactive material to go critical.
mutley1
11 Jan 163#30
best not to wear one at all. simple. :innocent:
Shengis to mutley1
11 Jan 16#31
Pretty much my attitude tbh. If I did wear one though i'd go Platinum/Wolfram as I dont like the cheap feel of Titanium. I have to admit I find Wolfram almost hypnotic to look at, it's quite fascinating how something can be shiny yet dark at the same time.......
crazygoldfish
11 Jan 162#29
You could say " I love you " better with the rings from a packet of Haribo.
They would probably last longer
Mr No
10 Jan 167#28
The bigger the wedding day, the earlier the divorce.
FREEZIN WOLF
10 Jan 162#27
Nothing says "i love you" more than a ring made out of the same stuff as drill bits.
Do they do sovereign rings too?
robertoegg
10 Jan 16#26
Mine was absolutely incredible. I loved every moment and wish I could go back and do the whole thing again...
Spedley
10 Jan 16#25
I bought my wife a ring made from Welsh Gold for £49. Mostly because it was the only one I could find that matched the engagement ring.
I'd have loved one of these for myself (except I don't wear jewellery). :-)
rollin182
10 Jan 161#24
I got a titanium wedding ring for myself 5 years ago from John Greed. I chosen not to have the tungsten as when read up on removing them in an emergency can be a problem. It is still in great condition no marks or changes to the shape and i do manual work where softer metals would have gotten damaged. No skin allergy problems for me either with the titanium one.
technomouse
10 Jan 161#22
Think you would have to hit it with a hammer for it to crack.
All sizes out of stock anyway.
benjai
10 Jan 161#21
Yeh right.
someguy003
10 Jan 162#20
Let me tell you as a man, we could think up of a more stressful day than a wedding day- it's truly awful
fishmaster
10 Jan 161#19
I do like girls that rock, but even I would be stretching to 'here's a cheap ring let's get married in a tent under the fridge' That has never worked, then again I've never wanted to be married and consequently that has never happened. Maybe if I drink more it will.
someguy003
10 Jan 162#18
Are you telling me that women can tell the difference between platinum, tungsten carbide and palladium rings just by looking at them???
alandigby
10 Jan 16#17
Just don't drop it... They're fairly brittle compared to other metals.
someguy003
10 Jan 161#16
Hold on a minute......Are you suppose to buy them an engagement ring before you buy them a wedding ring??? There are 2 rings that you need to buy??
blady
10 Jan 163#13
I like it for myself too!!! I have few rings on my fingers and none is wedding one (wedding ring have place in the box because it is gold and I'm not a gold fan). More,I am woman and completely do not understand why SOME men are so obsessed with weddings anyway? :wink: (Generalization is unconscionable).
ozkerrizo
10 Jan 16#10
Others measure it with the size of their :confused:
yorinul
10 Jan 1613#9
"Special Offer - Buy One, Get The Cheapest One Half Price"
Even bigamists like a bargain!
Steve1205
10 Jan 163#7
I've still got quite a few tungsten carbide tips from when I use to work on a lathe about 40 years ago.
pennyfarthing88
10 Jan 162#6
I can see his / her face now - completely overwhelmed coupled with a sheer desire to kill :laughing:
spannerzone
10 Jan 1613#1
Your bride/husband to be is a very lucky person
Gimble to spannerzone
10 Jan 1658#2
It's for myself, I am not materialist and I like the properties of the metal (weighty, almost scratch proof, dark silver appearance). I would still want it even if it was equivalently priced with platinum.
My fiancée was given a palladium engagement ring with a sapphire, again because I liked the properties of the metal over platinum and the color of the stone.
Maybe some people measure their love with the size of the rock?
spannerzone to spannerzone
10 Jan 16#4
That's fair enough, I honestly had no idea rings were even this cheap! - I'm certainly not into bling or rocks so guess can understand your logic.
os5889
10 Jan 1612#3
My fiancees ring was chosen based on the properties she liked...
Opening post
http://www.johngreedjewellery.com/sale-c323/john-greed-polished-tungsten-carbide-5mm-mens-ring-p23563 (polished 5mm)
http://www.johngreedjewellery.com/sale-c323/john-greed-tungsten-carbide-4mm-mens-ring-p36134 (brushed 4mm)
I have done a lot of research and I know people fear these because "they can not be removed in an emergency" but this is not true.
If you are into science more than bling then maybe you will like them?
--
Just noticed you can get buy one get one half price also.
"Special Offer - Buy One, Get The Cheapest One Half Price"
Top comments
My fiancée was given a palladium engagement ring with a sapphire, again because I liked the properties of the metal over platinum and the color of the stone.
Maybe some people measure their love with the size of the rock?
Even bigamists like a bargain!
Latest comments (62)
Im pretty sure they contain cobalt which leaches out and stains the ring.
Get titanium instead.
Titanium rings are much much lighter then any of the other metals. And despite what's said in the marketing, Ti rings get scratched pretty easily. But that makes it look more like a precious metal if anything since Tungsten can look a little too immaculate.
950 Platinum density is 20.1g/cm3
One is a prized precious metal, and the other makes tooling tips...
In pure form, Gold and Tungsten are within 1% of each other (because Tungsten is more tightly packed in its crystalline structure), but you're unlikely to see either in pure form for rings.
At the end of the day I think my question is pretty meaningless in the real world. If you were to blindfold somebody and place before them platinum,gold,TC and titanium rings I think the titanium would be the only identifiable one. The rest would all weigh roughly the same subjectively.
Platinum is typically 95% pure with Iridium making up the difference to harden it up, a Platinum ring (950 grade) or 18k + Gold has a very noticeable density to it that will set it apart from a much lighter Titanium, Palladium or Tungsten ring.
Unless you're going to alloy Tungsten 50:50 with depleted Uranium (or something just as heavy) or Gold 50:50 with Lithium (or something ridiculously light), there will always be quite a weight difference between the kind of rings you're talking about and something made from a precious metal.
http://www.screwfix.com/p/compression-olives-15mm-pack-of-20/69557?activeTab=rr
And if she doesn't like it, I have another 19 to go :smiley:
I've also tried a cobalt ring which I really liked but the sizing was off so it went back.
I have my real wedding ring is palladium but I've a habit of losing things so most days I wear a cheap (also JG) titanium ring. A few people have assumed it is a large platinum ring no one else has ever noticed it's not the real ring. Just shows it's not really worth paying out for expensive metals unless it personally means something to you to do that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5kWu1ifBGU
better going to the local brothel
They are exceptionally high quality, has a nice weight and is pretty much impossible to scratch being 4x stronger than titanium but be aware that this metal means that you'll never be able to resize the ring.
weekend think you are married... No wait that was in the 1950's and 1960's :confused:
... Women
The chances of finding out what condition the ring is in are just behind his chances of plaiting fog or knitting yoghurt.
They would probably last longer
Do they do sovereign rings too?
I'd have loved one of these for myself (except I don't wear jewellery). :-)
All sizes out of stock anyway.
Even bigamists like a bargain!
My fiancée was given a palladium engagement ring with a sapphire, again because I liked the properties of the metal over platinum and the color of the stone.
Maybe some people measure their love with the size of the rock?