Darn. As soon as I decided to get the curved Samsung for £149, this pops up. Much better resolution, not curved but still gorgeous. Free delivery.
Top comments
008
8 Jan 1618#4
Have some heat just for the fond memories of a real widescreen monitor ;-)
-BA-
8 Jan 169#1
£156 on Amazon
spaceinvader
9 Jan 168#30
No thanks, I'll stick with my multi monitor setup.
Darkle to intranix
8 Jan 168#11
Intranix is right. I think people are underestimating just how "short" this monitor will look.
The Dimensions without a stand are 609x287x55. That'll be Millimetres, so the screen is actually not even as tall as the standard 30cm ruler most of used in school.
My current main screen is a 25" Dell 1440p, and the screen is about 310mm tall (without the bezel), and I feel like that's what people will have in their mind when they think 25".
I'm not taking away from it, I just don't want anyone to have buyers remorse when it turns up.
All comments (49)
-BA-
8 Jan 169#1
£156 on Amazon
pdhroche to -BA-
9 Jan 16#43
Good find - I will never forgive Novatech after shutting my local store - spent a lot of money there and never bought anything since.
psychoid
8 Jan 163#2
if it helps, the gadget show did some analysis on curved and ultra hd tv, the result was curved wasn't as important and the effect wore off sooner. you could probably view it yourself i think it was john bentley.
malachi to psychoid
8 Jan 168#5
Curved is up there with 3D, foolish gimmick which doesn't improve the viewing experience. In most cases makes it worse as not everyone sits directly in front of the screen.
Have some heat just for the fond memories of a real widescreen monitor ;-)
sminky to 008
9 Jan 16#31
Used to have one of these. Lasted years and years.
LazybeatX
8 Jan 16#6
have the 29 inch version and it is a fantastic monitor.
piginabox
8 Jan 16#7
I've got this and it's grand. VESA mount on the back (Brix).
piginabox
8 Jan 16#8
No speakers though
friar_chris to piginabox
9 Jan 16#27
In my book that's a good thing. I appreciate it can be convenience, but unless you are only after the reassuring sound that Windows has booted up, with 10 Watt speakers at best and p!$$ poor bass you will be better off with a dedicated sub and satellite speakers. Sound may as well sound good.
Billythebubble
8 Jan 16#9
I really fancy buying this monitor, anyone bought one?
Also think my graphics card is DVi so I would have to buy dvi to hdmi converter, does this impact the image quality at all?
Appreciate any feedback please!
ra786 to Billythebubble
8 Jan 164#12
You do not need a DVI to HDMI converter, you need a DVI/HDMI adapter. No, there is absolutely no difference in image quality. There is essentially no difference between the signal that comes down a HDMI cable and a DVI cable. The only difference is the connector itself (that and the fact that DVI doesn't carry audio, so you'll need to use whatever you're currently using for the audio). So there is nothing to convert. The connection poses no hindrance to your choice.
UZOR to Billythebubble
9 Jan 16#28
not at all
intranix
8 Jan 163#10
25" ultra wide will be quite small dimension wise, will be like using a 21" 16:9
Darkle to intranix
8 Jan 168#11
Intranix is right. I think people are underestimating just how "short" this monitor will look.
The Dimensions without a stand are 609x287x55. That'll be Millimetres, so the screen is actually not even as tall as the standard 30cm ruler most of used in school.
My current main screen is a 25" Dell 1440p, and the screen is about 310mm tall (without the bezel), and I feel like that's what people will have in their mind when they think 25".
I'm not taking away from it, I just don't want anyone to have buyers remorse when it turns up.
Billythebubble
8 Jan 16#13
Thank you for confirming....I meant adaptor just got the terminology wrong.
Searched out a few reviews and stand seems to be substandard, 2 screws on 25" or 4 screws on 29", yellow bleed in bottom corners although image quality is suppose to be great?
Might order from Amazon for delivery on Sunday @ £156.83
dean026
8 Jan 161#14
LG (Loada Garbage) products are ok if you don't want product longevity and good after sales. Been stung by this firm a couple of times. It does look nice though but so did the one I bought that lasted 2 weeks out of warranty and when I contacted them I was told tough.
QNH2013 to dean026
8 Jan 16#20
Half right, I've got a monitor which has been a PITA and sent for repair three or four times. They've been very good about it, and it finally seems to be fixed. (A new problem rears itself occasionally, but it seems to be temporary, and I wouldn't complain about their service - if only they'd get it right!)
Significantly better than Samsung when I last required service a number of years ago.
acholmes2000 to dean026
9 Jan 162#32
load of crap ive bought loads of lg things and all have lasted well and owe me nothing!
simate to dean026
9 Jan 16#34
I've had an LG 47lw550T for 5 years without any issues.
ra786
8 Jan 161#15
Don't get me wrong, I knew what you meant too, I was just highlighting that there is no conversion process involved, hence no loss in quality, for the benefit of anyone else that may be reading. As far as this monitor is concerned, I personally see no use for ultra widescreen for everyday usage. It's more to awkward to view up close. But this is a good price if it's something you're interested in.
headnovel
8 Jan 161#16
Curved monitors do make sense, especially if you have several ultrawides together.
There is only one person viewing the image, so angle isn't an issue. It also helps with immersion for peripheral vision.
dxx
8 Jan 161#17
They have these in our union office. Personally, I think they're horrible. They're a really unpleasant size, I find. Ultra wide makes sense for a lot of purposes, but when the screen's as short as this, it doesn't really make sense for anything. You're better with a pair of cheap 22" 16:10 panels.
fouad172
8 Jan 16#18
Voted cold by mistake :disappointed:
ewen1605
8 Jan 161#19
Great monitor, I have two! I know it's not much help but they were £145 when I bought them from ebuyer in November.
tapi
8 Jan 161#21
got to agree. the gadget show info is relevant for TVs, it's an absolute waste of time. But for large wide monitors, the effect is useful. I'd prefer a setup as shown in one of the product shots though, with this flat screen in middle and two 19" 4:3's either side at 45 degrees (or equal height 16:10's)
voodooboard
9 Jan 161#22
These 25" ultrawide monitors are smaller than you might expect and £145-160 is the normal price range they fall into. Whoever voted hot needs to do some research first.
flashpanther
9 Jan 16#23
Just curious... what game is shown on the monitor? PC?
kidrock123
9 Jan 161#24
nice deal
GotBass
9 Jan 16#25
But for monitors theres only 1 person sitting directly in front of it?
nastoc
9 Jan 16#26
nice deal
neroneuk
9 Jan 16#29
very small, the equivalent at 1080p 16:9 is 20", even the 29" equivalent would be about 23"@ 16:9 1080p
trevornelmes to neroneuk
9 Jan 16#39
You are right, to be the same height as my current 1080p monitor, the screen would need to be 34" diagonal, and the cheapest I can find at that size, on a quick look, is the LG 34UM57 at eBuyer for £309. Plus, this deal 25" monitor does not support Freesync, so that would not be good with really fast frame rates on games. Still a hot price though.
spaceinvader
9 Jan 168#30
No thanks, I'll stick with my multi monitor setup.
HookedOnHotDeals
9 Jan 16#33
I am not really a fan of ultrawide displays and one of this size would be largely unusable IMO. A short time ago I went and looked at a 24" curved 16:9 FullHD Samsung monitor and I was surprised at how small it looked and I think an ultrawide 25" curved would look very cramped IMO. BTW I am not all that familiar with large panels so it's not a case of it all just being relative.
DigitalReaper
9 Jan 16#35
I wouldn't buy a 25" 21:9 monitor, it's going to be too small.
Smallest I've been looking at is a 34" but they are a bit pricey atm.
A 34" replaces the need for a dual monitor set up.
voodooboard
9 Jan 161#36
There's one possible exception: all LCD panels suffer from poor viewing angles. IPS, TN, VA, none of them have a stable picture. Especially consumer panels.
When you get to very large sizes (or sit very close) the problem can be bad enough that the edges of the monitor have colour/gamma shifting relative to the centre. You are viewing the centre of the screen at exactly 90deg but the left and right edges of the panel are viewed slightly off-angle. With large/wide displays it's a huge problem for professionals doing colour-critical work.
With a large, wide monitor (eg 34" ultra wide), a slight curve could potentially mean that the entire surface of the monitor is perpendicular to a central viewer. Maybe not perfectly perpendicular (depends on the curve radius and viewing distance) but certainly closer than a flat display.
It's not an advantage i've read in relation to curved displays but the theory holds up.
gvold
9 Jan 16#37
I just got the 34um67 and I wouldn't get it any smaller tbh I checked the 29" and found that to be small so to me this would be very small but this is a very good price
22james22
9 Jan 16#38
I'll agree for Televisions. But for a personal gaming monitor for gaming it's AMAZING. With a game POV slider that you can most PC games have you can have the POV match the curve in a very satisfying way.
flashpanther
9 Jan 16#40
Sorry lol.... still nobody knows what pc game is on the screen of the monitor in the photo? It's digging at me know. Need to know ha ha
I was surprised by how little extra width ultrawide monitors have to offer.
neroneuk
9 Jan 161#42
I use a 50" 4ktv on my desk, can get any custom made (NVidia only) resolutions and as an example a 1440p screen unscaled will be 36" in the middle of the screen or 33" at 2560x1080. I love my custom made resolution at 3840x1440(46" [email protected]:9 not 21:9) for single games and around 3200x1200(24:9) for MP to be more in control visually at a short distance and help with the FPS
008
9 Jan 16#44
>>>>>
Best 2 x Monitor set up ever had, one went down and Sony wanted £630 for a new tube, so
it went in the bin, had 4 x a4 Quark concepts/projects up at one time and was just superb to
use all day/night with no headaches or heat burn from the screens!!!
luvsadealdealdeal
9 Jan 16#46
I got that 27" one the other day for £149 & it seems pretty good, not sure I could go back to 25" now
ruc
9 Jan 16#47
You had to send it 3 to 4 times and there still is an occasional problem. .. says a lot about quality.
Soni84
10 Jan 16#48
It's quite a lot shorter than a normal 24" monitor. But I guess it's expected.
Opening post
Top comments
The Dimensions without a stand are 609x287x55. That'll be Millimetres, so the screen is actually not even as tall as the standard 30cm ruler most of used in school.
My current main screen is a 25" Dell 1440p, and the screen is about 310mm tall (without the bezel), and I feel like that's what people will have in their mind when they think 25".
I'm not taking away from it, I just don't want anyone to have buyers remorse when it turns up.
All comments (49)
Also think my graphics card is DVi so I would have to buy dvi to hdmi converter, does this impact the image quality at all?
Appreciate any feedback please!
The Dimensions without a stand are 609x287x55. That'll be Millimetres, so the screen is actually not even as tall as the standard 30cm ruler most of used in school.
My current main screen is a 25" Dell 1440p, and the screen is about 310mm tall (without the bezel), and I feel like that's what people will have in their mind when they think 25".
I'm not taking away from it, I just don't want anyone to have buyers remorse when it turns up.
Searched out a few reviews and stand seems to be substandard, 2 screws on 25" or 4 screws on 29", yellow bleed in bottom corners although image quality is suppose to be great?
Might order from Amazon for delivery on Sunday @ £156.83
Significantly better than Samsung when I last required service a number of years ago.
There is only one person viewing the image, so angle isn't an issue. It also helps with immersion for peripheral vision.
Smallest I've been looking at is a 34" but they are a bit pricey atm.
A 34" replaces the need for a dual monitor set up.
When you get to very large sizes (or sit very close) the problem can be bad enough that the edges of the monitor have colour/gamma shifting relative to the centre. You are viewing the centre of the screen at exactly 90deg but the left and right edges of the panel are viewed slightly off-angle. With large/wide displays it's a huge problem for professionals doing colour-critical work.
With a large, wide monitor (eg 34" ultra wide), a slight curve could potentially mean that the entire surface of the monitor is perpendicular to a central viewer. Maybe not perfectly perpendicular (depends on the curve radius and viewing distance) but certainly closer than a flat display.
It's not an advantage i've read in relation to curved displays but the theory holds up.
I was surprised by how little extra width ultrawide monitors have to offer.
Best 2 x Monitor set up ever had, one went down and Sony wanted £630 for a new tube, so
it went in the bin, had 4 x a4 Quark concepts/projects up at one time and was just superb to
use all day/night with no headaches or heat burn from the screens!!!