The Mail is a vile, far right paper. My conscience, if not my wallet, would rest better if I actually paid the full cost of a cinema ticket.

​Or take advantage of this deal and acknowledge the extra toilet paper.

Looks good enough. Although I notice it says Finally, spend 100 Mail Points. How do you earn/acquire mail points?

Think you get at least 100 points for purchasing the mail on Sunday.

Yeah, I've just had a look. Thanks for that :smiley:



To redeem the Mail Points you need to "Enter your Unique Numbers from the back page of the Daily Mail or The Mail on Sunday below and we will reward your loyalty with fabulous Rewards, Promotions and Loyalty Benefits."

Thanks for the post, heat added.

Do you need to print the cinema ticket or does it just give you a code to use at the cinema?

Does the ticket have an expiry date? Would want to see the Deadpool film, which hopefully would extinguish the mouth-stitched abomination in X Men Origins Wolverine

Can anythin be bought with exactly 100 points?

Bet loads of people just pop in there local shop and take a photo of the back page number, then walk out the shop with no purchase of the paper lol

Only 40p cheaper than the current 3 tickets for £12 deal on Groupon. Dearer if you don't usually but a lottery ticket.

The Mail is a vile, far right paper. My conscience, if not my wallet, would rest better if I actually paid the full cost of a cinema ticket.

oh shame, it's only for the weekend racist

Good if you can afford to shop at waitrose , I can only afford their bags

Or get a paper for £1.60, a magazine for £1.20, a coffee for £2.15 and then £5.05 of other stuff :man:. (You don't even need £5.05 of other stuff to get the free paper)

Me too. I was reluctant to post due to the anti daily mail folk.

I think you can use an old lottery ticket as well. If anyone from Worcester has an unchecked lottery ticket from January 9th I'd gladly take off their hands.

Toilet paper?
My good man, the daily mail would be more suited as compost.
Because it's rotten. :man:
........I'll get my coat.

But seriously, inky butt comes to mind. :confused:
And for all we know with using it as toilet paper.....the ink could give you cancer or in the short run, an infection. :confused:

Thanks

In case you're not being sarcastic....(can't tell online sometimes)
He means far right wing on the political ideology scale.

Essentially it's a Tory style newspaper. Propaganda spread to
mess with the poor to benefit the rich.
Research the difference between left and right wing.
I'm left centre myself as I consider it to be the most fair out of the fairly arbitrary political scale.

The Tories pretend they're right centre but they're far right like UKIP so they don't give a darn about the working class.
We're in austerity because of the bankers and Tories and we don't actually need to be. But what can ya do in corrupt society.
The Tories even started doing things against the middle class recently....
Just goes to show they're only in the job to benefit themselves and the selfish portion of the upper class corporations and banks. :disappointed:

I do hope Jeremy Corbyn wins the next election. :smiley:
His left wing policies are much more reasonable, fair and ethical.
Left wing believe the rich should help the poor, disabled, elderly, etc.
and believe in the greater good, I.e. Someone doesn't need 50 million pounds but some of that could be shared to people/services/resources for the people that do need it (+ everyone if its public services and not privatised)

It's time the corrupt part of the rich stop taking us for a ride.
They already evade tax, yet they still want more money and less money for everyone else whether they work hard or not.
This stuff and poverty shouldn't be happening in a modern 1st world country.
It's all down to greed and ignorance which lead to essentially.....evil.

Can you get two copies and two lotto to get two tickets on the same mail account?

Corbyn will never be prime minister. He is a joke of a leader

But labour made us bankrupt ? And joined the EU? I'm definitely conservative then ! ( but I read the sun newspaper so what does that mean ? Oh I'm so confused ! Politics is rubbish anyway how can you like labour or any party ?)

You can't knock someone for being rich and successful otherwise why get out of bed ? If poor people didn't churn out kids that they couldn't afford then they wouldn't be poor ? Life choices ! I'd rather send condoms to Ethiopia than rice ! That will end poverty

Green

Mate, you're just spreading classic Tory propaganda:
"blah blah Corbyn is unelectable, he is dangerous blah blah".
They never say why....because they're lying.

They call him a terrorist lover and even made a propaganda video about him
on YouTube, claiming he said "Bin laden's death was a tragedy"
when he actually said ".....tragedy OF JUSTICE"
because he'd rather bin laden have had a fair trial instead of be killed no questions asked,
no further questions that could be interrogated from here, etc.
Another Troy propaganda trick was claiming he called Isis or hamas (can't remember which it was)
as his "friends".
In reality, Corbyn referred to them as friends because he refers to
many people like that, including his opposition (e.g. political).
You're more likely to reason with people if you refer to them as friends rather than
"terrorist scumbags" for example.
Corbyn is a very clever man and he knows all about the right wing media (Daily Mail, The Sun, etc.)
and then propaganda....their agenda to make the rich, richer and the poor, poorer.

I take Corbyn's words over Cameron's ANY DAY.
Just hoping Corbyn isn't a puppet for false hope
for a fairer society. (Social economical equality for example.)

I never knocked anyone for being rich.
I don't discriminate based on social economic class.
That's what the Tories are doing.
Not all poor people churn out kids for money. (But I would say more than 5 kids is excessive in my opinion).
And lots of children is not the only reason for poverty.
Besides, I'd still help people no matter how many kids they have.
As long as they're not heartless murderers....

It's like refusing benefits to a 30 year old lad that did graffiti on walls in his teens and cleaned up his act.
I may refuse to help murderers (that have no remorse and can't be reasoned with / take psychiatric improvement)
but people you blame for being scroungers and baby churners.....you're demonising them too much and they're really just normal people
and they need help. Prevention is good but once the damage is done, why would
you turn away these people?
Besides, money from tax evasion is way way way bigger and could easily fill the void and
have room to fix the NHS, Transport For London services, etc..
Look at what privatisation has done to TFL....more delays, higher prices, etc. -_-

Anyway, I was hating on the portion of the rich that happens to be corrupt / selfish.
You know, the tax evading, low wage (to work ratio) giving CEOs, etc.
that would rather keep a few more useless quid (in the grand scheme of their vast pockets)
than help those who really need it.
That's what I'm saying.
I don't hate anyone rich, just for being rich....that would be illogical.
It's like hating the poor, just for being poor.

Poverty will end when the nation's money (including the money that never makes it to us,
due to big corporate tax evasion)
is used wisely on services (education, transport, psychology and science research, etc.)
and when the poor aren't punished for working (or being unable to work)
and when the rich companies stop evading tax....
Poor people can easily be nurtured to become wealthy....
But that takes money. People like the tories however, don't want that.
They want the opposite, they want the poor to stand in line
and work hard for little money while they get rich doing relatively little.

I don't mind the rich getting richer....but do those guys really have to make
the poor get poorer as well?? It's like slavery man....
The corrupt portion of the rich want more manual labour but they want
the poor to do it.
We could all easily become well off. But due to corruption, that's not happening
anytime soon.
But under Corbyn, things would be much better.
Assuming he can't be bullied / bribed into doing what the corporations and banks
want him to do.
But considering he's a life long left wing activist, I have confidence
he won't stab this country in the back like many politicians have. (E.g. Cameron.)

I'm not surprised people still believe that.
Honestly mate, I believed this garbage when I was a kid too but after
researching about political propaganda in this country,
it's clear to me how nasty the Tory party is.

Ok let me explain as I know more about this than the average person (most people are uninterested in politics so vote randomly or based on charisma rather than coherently good policies).

Firstly, Labour did NOT get us bankrupt.
That is classic Tory propaganda.
What actually happened was the bankers gambled with our money
and made huge losses (something about housing prices....just research if you're interested in specifics)
and Labour had to bail them out.

The global financial crisis....was GLOBAL.
So how could Labour have caused it?
They didn't. It was the bankers that caused it. (Irresponsible lending, probably stock market stuff too...)

They HAD to bail them out.
It was OUR money they lost after all.
Poor banks = poor nation according to the system (which needs to change....because in the UK,
less people in debt to the banks = less money to go around....MESSED UP? Yep. But currently that's how it works.
)

Besides, the Tories would have done the same (because it was necessary)
but it would have been worse under the Tories because they'd have introduced austerity there
and then.

If you don't believe me, research this stuff.
But I am telling you, the Tories are probably the biggest bunch of liars.
"We won't cut tax credits" ......yeah right....
"no one accept the MP salary raise" ....."nevermind, we're entitled boys!" :man:
You just have to Google search "Tory lies" and a vast ocean
of information is available.

The Sun newspaper is right wing biased. (And is a sensationalist tabloid....not in the same league as proper newspapers like the Guardian and the Independent which are both usually free of right wing lies.....usually.)

And let me explain why the Sun supported Labour sometimes....
Firstly, newspapers often support whoever seems to be winning in polls (Labour won a lot)
but another reason.....Labour hasn't always been truly left wing.

There's something called "New Labour"
when Tony Blair was in office (I kinda liked him but his true colours showed when I researched what he really was
and the REAL REASON for the IRAQ WAR).
New Labour was a kind of fake left wing party (mostly right centre with left wing traits)
so they were like a diluted version of tories (still way better than tories though)
but this was NOT classic Labour.

Classic Labour was the one that gave us the NHS.
Classic Labour was the one that had true left wing values like
free higher education, NON privatised services, etc.

Believe me, the Tories are NOT the party of the working.
They're the nasty party that seek to only benefit the upper class
while getting the working class (and evidently, recently the middle class now)
to pay for it.

Jeremy Corbyn however, seems like a true left wing activist and will bring back classic Labour.
He doesn't think it's a good idea to spend 500 million on a nuke (quite rightly so....it's a bloody waste of money....
they kept saying we were poor....suddenly we can pay for a 500 million pound nuke???? OK.....)

I mean....look at the backstabber MPs in Labour....it's like they were bribed or something.
The ones that defy Corbyn's left wing ideas (very fair, anti war, anti austerity, etc.)
and instead show their right wing traits.
That's why Corbyn reshuffled his party positions.....because
there were traitors in the party, left over from New Labour days. (Right wing leaners.)
There is no place for a right winger in a left wing party....that is just wrong.
It's essentially being a double agent and going against what classic Labour stood for.

And don't be surprised that you're confused about politics, MANY people are
and that's sadly one reason people vote the wrong party.
Even New Labour is better than the Tories but classic Labour (which I believe Corbyn will bring back
if he's elected) will be a thousand times better for working people.
Scroungers are just a bloody excuse for the Tories to spread their hate on the poor.
Scroungers don't cause anywhere near as much damage as the tax evading corporations.
Don't make your allies, your enemy!

As for thr EU....I honestly don't know anything about
the pros and cons of staying/leaving the EU so I can't comment on that yet.

Labour from the "New Labour" era (Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Ed Milliband)
wasn't perfect but it was still miles better than the tories.

But if Corbyn gets in, he'll reboot the Labour party (so to speak)
back to the classic era.

An example:

Tony Blair and Gordon Brown ---> raised tuition fees (uni education is a necessity these days....not a luxury!)

And after the Tory/Lib Dem coalition in 2010, increasing the tuition fees to a bloody 9k a year!.....
Ed Milliband ----> only offered to reduce it to 6k a year.....was the man even trying?
Either he had no choice (e.g. political pressure, bribery, etc.)
or he was truly a little too right wing for the Labour party.

Jeremy Corbyn ----> pretty sure I read one of his policies was to abolish tuition fees.
Now there's an honest left winger I can stand by. (If he's genuine. Looks like it, so far. :smiley: )

Another example is the Iraq war....Jeremy Corbyn would probably NEVER have decided
to go to war....
It was *apparently* about "weapons of mass destruction"
with the right wing American republican George W Bush (U.S. president at the time)
so it was suspicious from the start.....
I'm guessing Tony Blair was bullied into joining Uncle Sam America, in envading Iraq
to extract some oil.
I don't think Corbyn would have done it.
But Cameron probably would have, if he was in power.
Do you see the left wing vs right wing pattern?

BTW, in terms of news channels.....while I can't guarantee
the BBC is corruption free....it's publicly funded (via tax)
is more reliable / propaganda free compared to the likes
of right wing biased Sky News.
I wouldn't watch Sky News if I could help it.
The BBC is much better.
Sky News is like the British version of the American Fox News....
But not quite as bad....and not quite so obviously biased and opinionated and childish.
But still bad.

We need classic Labour back.
So hopefully people vote Jeremy Corbyn in.
Who do you trust more?
Corbyn or Cameron? :confused:
Easy question.:laughing:

You're either trying that psychological trick where you make people think "oh....he won't win...better not waste my vote on him!"
or you've actually fallen for the Tory propaganda.

Do you actually have a reason as to why you think Corbyn is a bad leader?
Is it because of reshuffling? Oh yeah....the tories like to point and laugh
at a fairly standard reshuffling of a party.....
Big deal. He controlled the situation and demoted (not promoted)
the backstabbers (Labour MPs that believe in non-Labour ideas like unnecessary and bloody airstrikes).

Or is it the fact that he's an older gentleman?
Or is it the fact the tories are running scared of a much stronger opposition....
Corbyn has been a left wing activist for many years of his life....
I'm pretty sure they're scared....even had a propaganda hit on him....

.....hey...why wasn't my previous reply to you, not posted yet?
I smell censorship.:confused:

HotUKPolitics.

I think this has gone slightly off topic

Anyone got a spare lotto code?

Some drama queens on here. Tks for post, 1 ticket secured for son.

Once I've registered the lottery code do I have to do anything?

It said I need to spend the points? But there's nothing for 100pts?

sent you a message

Likewise a spare lotto code appreciated here if there's one spare. Thanks

Hmm think we will have to disagree ! Labour spent money we didn't have getting the country into further debt that the conservatives are trying to clear. And as for joining the EU labour can never be forgiven for that. True corporations try to avoid to pay tax because they can that's government law that needs to be changed but they offer jobs . What does "waynetta" offer us who has kids she can't afford that we all have to pay for and will then maybe have another one just to get more money as she needs fags and special brew ? Some people can't be helped . I'd vote Nick farage given the chance but never airy fairy Corbyn we would be in a worse state than ever if he attempted to run a country , he can't even maintain his facial hair ! I'd even vote lib dems over labour but to be honest there all crap maybe they need a new system like Russell brand wanted

Can you stop speaking about politics and help with the bunch of questions swamped by you guys arguing?

Okay you found how to do it:

Make account

Register unique code from today's paper

Register lotto ticket number

Click the following link: https://www.mymail.co.uk/catalogue/reward/editorsPick/1323

100 points are deducted and they email you confirmation (still waiting on my email).

I don't think anyone will be buying a paper or joining online to confirm their political leanings or identity, they just want a cheap cinema ticket FFS!!!!

I am awaiting verification of my lotto code. Is that your situation?

I'm waiting for confirmation. I've received no email yet. How about you?

No

It's the mail so will be very hard just pay the normal price and keep Hollywood afloat

I have received a confirmation email. Just waiting for my lotto number to be checked now.

Anyone else got a spare lotto ticket number? Girlfriend as a paper code but no lotto ticket.

Odd you have to wait for the eticket. No films are jumping out as must watch films at the moment.

Applied for mine last Sunday, Not heard anything yet.

Thank you for taking part in our ‘Free Cinema Ticket’ Promotion with The Mail on Sunday.
As part of the promotion, we were obligated to verify the Lotto Ticket Number you entered. Unfortunately, following verification with Camelot, the Lotto Ticket Number that you entered (877402426**********) was invalid. We have therefore refunded the 100 Mail Points that you spent on this promotion.
There are a few reasons why this may have happened:
• You may have mis-typed the ticket number
• You may have entered a Euromillions, Hot Picks or Thunderball ticket number instead of a Lotto Ticket Number
• You may have entered a ticket number from a draw outside 16th and 30th Jan
We’re sorry that you weren’t successful this time around. Look out for the chance to win a free ticket in the Daily Mail soon!

Didn't think I had, glad you got yours though, I thought they might be fobbing everyone off but obviously not!