Price is with Coop discount automatically applied. Standard price £339.99.
Free delivery.
Cheaper than anywhere else.
Top comments
dayjur1
26 Nov 153#6
the reviews on Amazon are very poor. shame.
Latest comments (30)
AJ92
10 Dec 15#30
Unexpire as back in stock at same price.
hotukdealz
27 Nov 15#29
OOS.....
hotmale_com
27 Nov 15#28
sold out .. shucks great tv for a great BF price
nexus76
27 Nov 15#27
Proper mugs on this post. Just buy it as a entry level 4k which is what it is!!! if on a budget or after a quality HDtv for around 300 this is ideal or an LG as both brands pee on any other make.Ignore anyone talking about sizes as its misleading and misses the point that this is a great deal.
johnandy991
27 Nov 15#26
4K technology good
alexorza
27 Nov 151#25
ok, when full HD came up everyone was like "woooow i can see the hair in that guy's nose..." now with 4K TV, the hair in that's guy nose can still be seen and that's about it... you can't see his DNA or anything... especially for an 40" display,,,
wookiemann
27 Nov 15#23
And staff double discount today and tomorrow! They emailed out a code to staff earlier as well for 20% off purchases of over £200, not sure if this works without the staff discount
shekman to wookiemann
27 Nov 15#24
Would you mind sharing this staff code with us Wookiemann? :smiley:
sradmad
26 Nov 15#22
good find op, heat
Likely2
26 Nov 15#21
and just to add from the worlds leading TV geek :smiley:
And it applies to ALL screens not just Apple....I'd rather take his word than a Currys salesman / AV Review / Anon Forum Post, etc.... wouldn't you! If anyone disagrees then please email him and let us know how it goes....
Myasinax
26 Nov 15#20
Does this do 60Hz on HDMI input?
nguaddar
26 Nov 151#15
it makes me really laugh when people expect and want a quad hd display on their tiny phones and yet moan about 4k on a 40". each to their own and their budget
Likely2 to nguaddar
26 Nov 15#18
Where does it say in this thread people expect and want quad HD on their phones! Not everyone does or even care or are more informed about what lies the companies feed people, as that is just as useless as a 4K 40" TV, people are generally sheep when it comes to technology and they far too easily believe the nonsense they are fed by the companies selling these products.
I don't see anyone moaning just trying to inform people that a 40" 4K TV is as useful as a chocolate teapot as you will never see the difference, if you say you can then there is no hope, now that is funny.
robodan918 to nguaddar
26 Nov 152#19
quad HD isn't 4K FYI
and the PPI matters more when you're looking at a screen that's closer to your face. This should be obvious, but I'll say it anyway: your eyes can see better and discriminate better between points that are closer to you than far away. There are diminishing returns, sure, but 2K phones do look better at 1-1.5" than 1080P, 720P, etc.
SL7
26 Nov 15#17
For me, £320 for a 4k Samsung smart TV is hot hot hot
Likely2
26 Nov 151#16
Slightly off topic but....What I don't get is if all this Technology is so great and advanced yet they have to 'upscale' everything to '4k' why can't they just have a TV that reverts to 1080 (No difference between i & P) or 720 when the source needs it as upscaling is just wrong and doesn't really work, not so smart TV's is what they really are.
http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/why-4k-tvs-are-stupid/
"That's right, at 10 feet, your eye can't resolve the difference between otherwise identical 1080p and 720p televisions. Extrapolating this out, you'd have to get a TV at least 77 inches diagonal before you'd start having a pixel visibility problem with 1080p"
4K = Good for mega large mega expensive TVs >77" (or better yet projectors). It's cost is totally unjustifiable for 40" TV in a living room. For a gaming monitor you sit 3-4 feet from, it's probably a good idea.
Stick with 1080P until 4K projectors get cheaper
LtfdTony
26 Nov 15#12
Yep the reviews I checked on Amazon were all 4 and 5 there was 1 poor review and that related to the apps on the telly
robodan918
26 Nov 152#9
4K on 40"...
HAHAHAHA why?
Likely2 to robodan918
26 Nov 151#11
It gives the Marketing Department something to do....:smiley:
dayjur1
26 Nov 153#6
the reviews on Amazon are very poor. shame.
snoopyhill to dayjur1
26 Nov 15#10
I can only find one review for the 40" on Amazon and it gave 5 stars the poor reviews were for 55". Gets great reviews on ao and argos
LtfdTony
26 Nov 15#8
Ordered Hot
Likely2
26 Nov 15#7
Netflix 4K Streaming - Is this TV compatible with streaming 4K Ultra-HD content from Netflix? - Yes
Opening post
Free delivery.
Cheaper than anywhere else.
Top comments
Latest comments (30)
And it applies to ALL screens not just Apple....I'd rather take his word than a Currys salesman / AV Review / Anon Forum Post, etc.... wouldn't you! If anyone disagrees then please email him and let us know how it goes....
I don't see anyone moaning just trying to inform people that a 40" 4K TV is as useful as a chocolate teapot as you will never see the difference, if you say you can then there is no hope, now that is funny.
and the PPI matters more when you're looking at a screen that's closer to your face. This should be obvious, but I'll say it anyway: your eyes can see better and discriminate better between points that are closer to you than far away. There are diminishing returns, sure, but 2K phones do look better at 1-1.5" than 1080P, 720P, etc.
:smiley:
"That's right, at 10 feet, your eye can't resolve the difference between otherwise identical 1080p and 720p televisions. Extrapolating this out, you'd have to get a TV at least 77 inches diagonal before you'd start having a pixel visibility problem with 1080p"
4K = Good for mega large mega expensive TVs >77" (or better yet projectors). It's cost is totally unjustifiable for 40" TV in a living room. For a gaming monitor you sit 3-4 feet from, it's probably a good idea.
Stick with 1080P until 4K projectors get cheaper
HAHAHAHA why?