I have just got back from aldi and after looking at the £19.99 trainers I found these labeled up at £14.99. But they went through the till at £9.99.
Top comments
Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 159#22
You're made to think (by clever advertising and gimmicks, gel, support etc) that you can't possibly run in cheap trainers. Like I mentioned earlier I ran in issued Hi-tecs whilst in the army, I recorded my fast ever 5k of about 17:20 in them. Unfortunately it was an army marked course and doesn't appear on my PO10 profile.
My next best 5k is 17:50 ran in Adidas Supernova Sequence Boost a support shoe(because I pronate). Whilst I was a couple years younger when I ran the army time I did so in the what I'd now consider to be the cheapest and nastiest trainer I've ever owned. At the time I ran because the army made me, since I've left I do it to keep fit and for "fun" I probably don't need £100 boosts but I choose to wear them in the hope that they are the difference between a decent run and a PB. Truth in my opinion is that they probably make marginal difference and as long as the shoe is suitably fitted (I go up a shoes size in running trainers due to swelling when I run) I don't think you'll see much difference.
Adidas/Reebok, Nike, Brooks, Saucony, New Balance may all tell you that you need gel, foam, cushioning etc but these companies are trying to sell you stuff. Many of the top African runners run barefoot at the beginning of their careers. Just look at Zola Budd and how well she done without top (any) trainers.
I ran in these last week and my big toe burst inside them after only 20 minutes. Took them back for a refund. COLD
leecornall
3 Dec 154#6
With the state of me working out at the gym, I don't think these will make me look any worse. :smiley:
All comments (54)
MumSaidNo
3 Dec 15#1
Good for that price.
paneds
3 Dec 15#2
actually probably only worth 9.99 definitely wouldnt pay any more for them
NEtech
3 Dec 153#3
Do they have the Aldi logo and name on them? Aldi 4 stripe. :smile:
crannagio
3 Dec 153#4
holy ****...
snowflake75
3 Dec 154#5
if i saw a guy wesring these, i would run in the opposite direction
7777777 to snowflake75
4 Dec 153#10
I would not, maybe because I run regularly and do not care who is wearing what.
leecornall
3 Dec 154#6
With the state of me working out at the gym, I don't think these will make me look any worse. :smiley:
pwel
3 Dec 15#7
without that wobbly A on the side,they wouldnt look that bad
sradmad
4 Dec 15#8
good find op, heat , ALDI quality at that price, heat added :smiley:
Neobrown
4 Dec 151#9
Do they have a red A on them, for Aldi? Oh dear
JarrodWRX
4 Dec 151#11
That actual shoe ?
Cheap as its asics
blue1971 to JarrodWRX
4 Dec 15#13
I thought this.
Jay20VT
4 Dec 151#12
Aldi Sport.. eat more veg lol
nmarshgiddings
4 Dec 152#14
Buy cheap, buy twice is the motto with trainers. In my experience cheap trainers last a few months if you're lucky, whereas a decent pair will last years. I've had proper branded trainers last 5 years or more, cheap ones fall apart after a few months.
kramer2088 to nmarshgiddings
4 Dec 15#15
Interesting theory. Most "experts" suggest changing running shoes every few hundred miles , but this might just be encourage you to continue buying. The most expensive running shoes I ever bough (newtons)/wore out in months.
Paddy_o_furniture to nmarshgiddings
4 Dec 151#16
You can't do much in them, you should only get 500 miles from a pair of trainers.
I buy 3 or so pairs of good (adidas) trainers a year.
I like good trainers but they don't make me run any faster or provide much more comfort. I ran in hi-tecs (issued) in the army and my running hasn't differed much.
dodgymix
4 Dec 151#17
Serious you can pick up Adidas Duramo 6 for £20-£25
Why would you want unbranded footwear if you were planning to run
ted_ba to dodgymix
4 Dec 151#42
why does a brand make things automatically better?
BadBadger
4 Dec 154#18
I ran in these last week and my big toe burst inside them after only 20 minutes. Took them back for a refund. COLD
cf20
4 Dec 151#19
i've had some before they are absolutely rubbish for running, the soles absorb nothing and your lower legs will ache in no time.
premierfella to cf20
4 Dec 151#21
No pain, no gain :wink:
(I only run in branded, quality running shoes - other runners will soon blog if the brand is useless in terms of support, durability, etc before you buy. No chance of getting reliable runner comments on unbranded shoes as they won't touch them with a long bargepole.)
algloster
4 Dec 152#20
Have bought these and lidl trainers and they are okay, cushioning and build comparable to my more expensive asics however they are not as well ventilated and my feet do get hotter.
But the one weakness I have found is that I heal strike quite heavily and whereas asics with their more abrasion resistant rubber tend to last me around 3 months (based on 25-40 miles a week) the aldi / lidl shoes wear through to the sole cushioning material in 3-4 weeks. Hence for me its buy cheap buy thrice. But depending on how you run they may be great for you.
Personally I've never paid more than £60 for shoes and wait till a good deal arrives on the internet and then buy a couple of pairs.
Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 159#22
You're made to think (by clever advertising and gimmicks, gel, support etc) that you can't possibly run in cheap trainers. Like I mentioned earlier I ran in issued Hi-tecs whilst in the army, I recorded my fast ever 5k of about 17:20 in them. Unfortunately it was an army marked course and doesn't appear on my PO10 profile.
My next best 5k is 17:50 ran in Adidas Supernova Sequence Boost a support shoe(because I pronate). Whilst I was a couple years younger when I ran the army time I did so in the what I'd now consider to be the cheapest and nastiest trainer I've ever owned. At the time I ran because the army made me, since I've left I do it to keep fit and for "fun" I probably don't need £100 boosts but I choose to wear them in the hope that they are the difference between a decent run and a PB. Truth in my opinion is that they probably make marginal difference and as long as the shoe is suitably fitted (I go up a shoes size in running trainers due to swelling when I run) I don't think you'll see much difference.
Adidas/Reebok, Nike, Brooks, Saucony, New Balance may all tell you that you need gel, foam, cushioning etc but these companies are trying to sell you stuff. Many of the top African runners run barefoot at the beginning of their careers. Just look at Zola Budd and how well she done without top (any) trainers.
what he said, also include various supplements etc
Retify to Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 15#27
The shoes won't make you hit your pb, but they can certainly stop you from achieving it. Getting cheap, nasty, unsupportive shoes is asking for injury since you are putting far more strain on your legs than is necessary. I'm sure you were fine in the army in your youth where your body can adapt much more easily and take more punishment, but you will regret it later down the line when your ankles, shins and knees are shot because your shoes weren't absorbing more of the impact for you.
bluntmachetti to Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 15#28
So thats two running magazines endorses these !!!
m1lz
4 Dec 155#24
Aldi-das
bluntmachetti
4 Dec 15#25
There was a review of these in the October issue of Mens Running and they were considered to be good value for money. I have a pair of Avia running shoes (Asda brand) and I prefer them to my Duramos, it did require a few runs to break them in but afterwards they were fine. I do over 100 miles a month and I only ever use the more expensive brands for races and long runs.
whitecarlos
4 Dec 15#26
3 year guarantee?
TDog123
4 Dec 15#29
You would seriously struggle to cling onto any street credibility you may have with these attached to your feet but if you only intend to go out after dark and spend your time in places where the local council have not maintained street lighting, they may tick your box !
bluntmachetti to TDog123
4 Dec 151#30
Considering that most of the branded / expensive running shoes i have seen are ugly i dont see your point. these are running shoes and not fashionable trainers.
Duelling Duck
4 Dec 15#31
The 'non-premium' version go through at £7.50. I bought two pairs last week. The foam layer is thicker on the premium ones and the rubber is softer and from my experience with other running shoes I think they'd wear out faster than the non-premium ones. It had nothing to do with the price but the premium ones seemed like they were just window dressing and too 'bouncy' for want of a better word. Yes, I stood in Aldi jumping up and down and mock running and did not give a damn what people thought.
Just weighed one of them (£7.50 ones) and it's 302 grammes for a size 10 which is pretty good. And the ventilation is fine - you can see through the venting panels - even see your fingers inside from the outside. I'm one of them that thinks too much cushioning doesn't feel good. I did like it when I started running but once I built up those stabilisation and support muscles it changed.
And if you care what logo is on your daps when you're out then it's not the running you're really about, is it.
TDog123 to Duelling Duck
4 Dec 15#35
Not many people buy trainers to actually run in them so you are in the minority there. I take my hat off to you though for charging up and down the aisles in Aldi to check for comfort with a £7.50 sports shoe on, as most shoppers in store must have raised eyebrows and the local nuthouse must have conducted a head count on their residents after receiving calls from concerned shoppers about a possible escapee !
purplehornet
4 Dec 15#32
I would suggest that anyone intending to run over any reasonable distance on a regular basis has a gait analysis done before buying any running shoe - getting the correct support is crucial in avoiding injury problems down the line. Imagine these would be absolutely fine for a neutral gait
TDog123 to purplehornet
4 Dec 152#44
here here, i also find it's a good idea to do a thorough risk assessment of the kitchen utensils before the wife prepares dinner as all that slicing and dicing she could break a nail or worse nick a finger.
Obstinate_Person to purplehornet
4 Dec 151#48
You don't really believe that do you? The pronation support theory was debunked years ago
dunnyfunkster to purplehornet
4 Dec 15#51
Rather than a gait analysis and buy specialist shoes, I would argue that it is better to work on changing your gait to prevent injuries. This time last year I bought two pairs of the aldi "natural" running shoes (at a reduced cost of £7.50 each), and tried to concentrate on changing to a forefoot strike. Takes a bit of getting used to, but 2015 has been my first ever non-injury year, and I managed PBs at half marathon and marathon distances. Granted, both pairs of shoes have now pretty much reached the end of their useful lives, but I have managed to have a year of running for £15. Used to go for gait analysis every time I bought running shoes, and spent about £70 for shoes to last 6 months.
TDog123
4 Dec 15#33
All trainers are designed for physical activity whether fashionable or not so I don't see your point and you couldn't get much uglier than the shoes in question so move on !
dodgymix
4 Dec 15#34
Adidas boost arent much more expensive, bought my wife some Adidas Questar boost for £18 off M&M delivered last month
Start from £25 presently with loads of styles from £29.99, free postage over £30 with code and running socks are a quid
Nothing to do with the money they will receive for running in a companies shoes.
Duelling Duck
4 Dec 15#37
I'm one of the only people in my town with two eyes and a remaining tooth. I'm like George Clooney here but Sloth from Goonies when I go beyond the boundary. And they certainly don't like runners because it shows a degree of self-improvement and them hates thaaat. They chase you with pitchforks and flames. I'm getting the whole town fit in a way.
whitesnake29
4 Dec 15#38
They are awful quality, I purchased ladies pair just for work I sit at desk all day and 3 weeks later the soles were split
stefromuk
4 Dec 15#39
they are actually going through at £3.79 at my local aldi .
ideal just for work :smiley:
Obstinate_Person
4 Dec 15#41
Aldi just sell tat these days. Their reputation for quality on the cheap has been destroyed over the past 12 shameful months
dodgymix
4 Dec 15#43
professional runners just like footballers will get the footwear designed / made specifically for them. Adidas certainly do for their footballers with boots manfactured specifically for the players individual foot / style.
If I ran marathons for a living would I wear Aldi trainers if Aldi offered me the best sponsorship deal.. No
Youre not just paying for a brand name. Youre paying for decades of Research and development that has cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
aldi has copied some cheap manufactures design and added some detailing
R&D / Design / Products used in production / track record / links to sport /
Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 15#45
But we're not talking about professional marathon runners. For someone that might be doing couch to 5k or the odd parkrun I can't see why these wouldn't be fine.
How do you know aldi hasn't included research into these trainers?
dodgymix
4 Dec 15#46
A budget supermarket selling own brand trainers ??
come on be serious
The onyl research will have been to find the cheapest manfacture basing the entire order on whether they can pay £1.22 per pair instead of £1.24 per pair
Paddy_o_furniture
4 Dec 151#47
They get good write ups in several magazines. They sell good quality food at a fraction of brands (so the ads tell me). Why can't this be replicated with trainers? Sure the initial selling price of these was around £20.
Shayno
4 Dec 15#49
:laughing: ... first Tesco trainers thread yesterday, now Aldi trainers. I'm holding out for a pair of Morrison's myself. :smirk:
tonypop
4 Dec 15#50
I only went in for coleslaw and came out with running shoes and speedboat. Good old Aldi.
bluntmachetti
4 Dec 15#52
^^ This, fix your running and you will run more efficiently. At the moment i am trying to get the hang of bounding which helps ensure my feet spend less time on the ground and reduces the risk of injury.
trd
5 Dec 15#53
W-w-wait I thought trolls didn't wear shoes?
mku786
5 Dec 15#54
good price, heat given. I wouldn't get them myself though, cheaper brands tend to offer a lack of proper foot support. You're probably better off waiting a bit for the adidas duramo 6's to go down to about 18-21.50 (inc quidco) directly from adidas. The price has come that low twice as of late. I picked up my first pair for 18 and the others for 21.50. They offer that extra foot support and cushioning.
Opening post
Top comments
My next best 5k is 17:50 ran in Adidas Supernova Sequence Boost a support shoe(because I pronate). Whilst I was a couple years younger when I ran the army time I did so in the what I'd now consider to be the cheapest and nastiest trainer I've ever owned. At the time I ran because the army made me, since I've left I do it to keep fit and for "fun" I probably don't need £100 boosts but I choose to wear them in the hope that they are the difference between a decent run and a PB. Truth in my opinion is that they probably make marginal difference and as long as the shoe is suitably fitted (I go up a shoes size in running trainers due to swelling when I run) I don't think you'll see much difference.
Adidas/Reebok, Nike, Brooks, Saucony, New Balance may all tell you that you need gel, foam, cushioning etc but these companies are trying to sell you stuff. Many of the top African runners run barefoot at the beginning of their careers. Just look at Zola Budd and how well she done without top (any) trainers.
Runners world article and Aldi running gear: http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/gear/preview-aldi-running-gear/12325.html
All comments (54)
Cheap as its asics
I buy 3 or so pairs of good (adidas) trainers a year.
I like good trainers but they don't make me run any faster or provide much more comfort. I ran in hi-tecs (issued) in the army and my running hasn't differed much.
Why would you want unbranded footwear if you were planning to run
(I only run in branded, quality running shoes - other runners will soon blog if the brand is useless in terms of support, durability, etc before you buy. No chance of getting reliable runner comments on unbranded shoes as they won't touch them with a long bargepole.)
But the one weakness I have found is that I heal strike quite heavily and whereas asics with their more abrasion resistant rubber tend to last me around 3 months (based on 25-40 miles a week) the aldi / lidl shoes wear through to the sole cushioning material in 3-4 weeks. Hence for me its buy cheap buy thrice. But depending on how you run they may be great for you.
Personally I've never paid more than £60 for shoes and wait till a good deal arrives on the internet and then buy a couple of pairs.
My next best 5k is 17:50 ran in Adidas Supernova Sequence Boost a support shoe(because I pronate). Whilst I was a couple years younger when I ran the army time I did so in the what I'd now consider to be the cheapest and nastiest trainer I've ever owned. At the time I ran because the army made me, since I've left I do it to keep fit and for "fun" I probably don't need £100 boosts but I choose to wear them in the hope that they are the difference between a decent run and a PB. Truth in my opinion is that they probably make marginal difference and as long as the shoe is suitably fitted (I go up a shoes size in running trainers due to swelling when I run) I don't think you'll see much difference.
Adidas/Reebok, Nike, Brooks, Saucony, New Balance may all tell you that you need gel, foam, cushioning etc but these companies are trying to sell you stuff. Many of the top African runners run barefoot at the beginning of their careers. Just look at Zola Budd and how well she done without top (any) trainers.
Runners world article and Aldi running gear: http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/gear/preview-aldi-running-gear/12325.html
Just weighed one of them (£7.50 ones) and it's 302 grammes for a size 10 which is pretty good. And the ventilation is fine - you can see through the venting panels - even see your fingers inside from the outside. I'm one of them that thinks too much cushioning doesn't feel good. I did like it when I started running but once I built up those stabilisation and support muscles it changed.
And if you care what logo is on your daps when you're out then it's not the running you're really about, is it.
Start from £25 presently with loads of styles from £29.99, free postage over £30 with code and running socks are a quid
http://www.mandmdirect.com/02/fts/?search=adidas boost&fh_sort_by=+mandmgbp_sellingprice
Seriously why would anyone seriously wear aldi trainers for sport
Adizero adios boost ~ the fastest Marathon ever was run in these In Berlin in 2013 so clearly favoured by the professionals
http://www.mandmdirect.com/02/fts/?search=adidas+Mens+Adizero+Adios+Boost+&fh_sort_by=+mandmgbp_sellingprice
ideal just for work :smiley:
If I ran marathons for a living would I wear Aldi trainers if Aldi offered me the best sponsorship deal.. No
Youre not just paying for a brand name. Youre paying for decades of Research and development that has cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
aldi has copied some cheap manufactures design and added some detailing
R&D / Design / Products used in production / track record / links to sport /
How do you know aldi hasn't included research into these trainers?
come on be serious
The onyl research will have been to find the cheapest manfacture basing the entire order on whether they can pay £1.22 per pair instead of £1.24 per pair