I own this card and am really happy with it.Handled any game I've thrown at it. If you're looking for 4K Ultra-High settings gaming this is not for you, but if you're a casual gamer like myself then its a great little card. It's overclockable and not power-hungry.
Memory Amount - 2048MB
Memory Interface - 128bit
DRAM Type - GDDR5
Graphics Clock Base Clock : 1085MHz / Boost Clock : 1163MHz
Memory Clock - 2750MHz (DDR 5500MHz)
CUDA Cores - 640
Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) - 88
NVIDIA 3D Vision Ready - Yes
NVIDIA FXAA Technology - Yes
NVIDIA TXAA Technology - Yes
SMX - Yes
Microsoft DirectX - 11.2
OpenGL - 4.4
Bus Support - PCI-E 3.0 x 16
Certified for Microsoft Windows 7 - Yes
Certified for Microsoft Windows 8 - Yes
Maximum Digital Resolution - 4096x2160
Maximum VGA Resolution - 2048x1536
Dual-Link DVI - Yes
VGA - Yes
HDCP -Yes
HDMI - mHDMI
Height 2 Slot
Board Length - 166mm
PCB Width - 145mm x 112mm
Graphics Card Power - 60 W
Minimum Recommended System Power - 400 W
Accessory - Manual, Driver Disc
Top comments
litwoojczyznomoj
23 Nov 158#2
I've played The Witcher 2 , Crysis2 on it and was pleased with the performance. Seen the videos ofWitcher 3 being played on it. Granted , not at the highest settings or fps but it doesnt bother me.
cannycoyote
23 Nov 154#4
totally agree, unless your mad about gaming and knocking up some pretty impressive weekly stats then this is perfect for the casual gamer. i own one and it plays bioshock infinite on ultra settings surprisingly well.
Latest comments (25)
ste93
23 Nov 15#13
Has anyone tried running fallout 4 or black ops 3 with this? If so, does it perform okay?
jan81 to ste93
23 Nov 151#17
Digital Foundry did a performance comparison for fallout 4 and found that their budget PC with a 750ti performed about as well, or a bit better than the ps4 version.
My living room PC has a 750 Ti, dual core Pentium K G3258 and 8GB RAM and both these games ran fine on it; I set the graphics to mostly medium settings to keep my frame rates between 50 to 60.
You should get similar results if your using an i3 processor and slightly lower frame rates if using a dual core like the Pentium K G3258.
biglugs1
24 Nov 15#24
Me and Junior have 750ti cards in our desktops and they're great. My son plays online games all the time and this copes really well with his twin 24" monitors, and I play WoW at pretty high settings on my machine.
As others have said these won't allow playing at 4k but for casual games they're a great buy.
stevej1976
24 Nov 15#23
Yeh it does, I'm debating on waiting to Black Friday/Monday and see if anything better deals surface.
stevej1976
23 Nov 15#20
Will this be ok to install in an old gaming PC around 5 years old. Currently running a GTX 260 and looking for something to bring it a bit more up to date. I've just replaced the PSU with a nvidia bronze 600w.
jan81 to stevej1976
23 Nov 15#22
The card uses very little power so should run fine off that PSU. I've heard of people attaching them to 300W ones. The motherboard has a PCI express socket for the card?
SurprisedGuy
23 Nov 151#21
Really? thats so surprising, that cards costing 40 - 60 % more are better, who'd of guessed
Waste of money this card for as long as it is over 50 quid. It's slower than 7850 ffs. Also Nvidia drivers are terrible these days.
Firejack to stanlenin
23 Nov 151#18
The current equivalent of a HD7850 would be something like a R7 370 and thats ~£25 more expensive for a small performance boost.
Also, personally I use AMD, Intel and NVIDIA graphics and I encounter more or less the same amount of problems with their respective drivers.
Coincidentally, I also got a 750 Ti Low Profile because it was the most powerful card I could get into my low profile pc :stuck_out_tongue: I've managed to get high textures 60fps on GTA V, but I have to play at 900p instead of 1080p :neutral_face:
livid_chimp
23 Nov 15#15
Yep, what he said. It's the most powerful card that will fit in my low profile HTPC. If I lowered all the other settings significantly, I'd probably get High textures, but think I'd struggle to get Very high with 2gb? (at 1080) Happy to be corrected...
Jesse148
23 Nov 15#14
I think what he meant is he has the Gigabyte Low Profile 750 Ti Graphics Card. It's got 2gb of VRAM, but it's in a low profile configuration (small enough to fit inside a low profile case). As far as I know, low profile versions perform almost exactly the same as their larger counterparts
livid_chimp
23 Nov 15#7
Second that - runs GTA V very respectably at 1080 - all settings h/vh expect textures. Averages 35-40 fps. Up to 60fps with Bioshock Infinite, 1080 all settings maxed out. Only running an AMD A8 too.
I've got the Gigabit low profile version - guess you can get a little more OC'ing from this with the larger fan.
JustExtreme to livid_chimp
23 Nov 15#11
You mean 1 gigabyte version? That will be why you can't run GTA V at Very High textures - with the 2GB version of this you should be fine to.
pedd
23 Nov 15#10
Thanks very much for the info Firejack. I only find myself shopping for this stuff once every 5 years, and it's hard to get back up to speed. I'll look at the Steam community comments and roll the dice...
frakison
23 Nov 15#9
Ignore it, you will always get one fool!! this is £87 FFS! Thanks for sharing :smiley:
Dave_dave69
23 Nov 15#8
great price.
Firejack
23 Nov 15#6
Unfortunately its still not clear at the moment what the best graphics card solution for Steam In-Home Streaming is.
Currently the Steam client on Windows for NVIDIA graphics is using NVIFR or NVFBC (more commonly known to you and I as the capture methods for NVIDIA Shadowplay). However the Steam beta client has just added support for NVENC (the dedicated hardware video encoder) and reading the comments from the Steam developers ( http://steamcommunity.com/groups/homestream/discussions/0/485622866444927070/#c485622866445135612 ) it seems like NVENC is the goal they are currently working towards.
If NVENC makes it to the live client then yes, a GTX 750 Ti would be a good choice of graphics card in the host machine. Since its a Maxwell based GPU with the 2nd gen NVENC hardware encoder inside which is very capable of 1080p encoding.
jan81
23 Nov 152#5
I'm pretty happy with my 750ti. Of course it's not as powerful as the top of the range cards but it's relatively cheap, uses very little power and will let you play modern games. Digital Foundry use a 750ti with an i3 in their budget PC and on multiplatform games it regularly matches or slightly exceeds the ps4 in their tests. As with everything it depends on your needs, but for 1080p great performance on games for last gen and reasonable performance on games built for the ps4 and Xbox1. Check out youtube for videos of it running a variety of games.
cannycoyote
23 Nov 154#4
totally agree, unless your mad about gaming and knocking up some pretty impressive weekly stats then this is perfect for the casual gamer. i own one and it plays bioshock infinite on ultra settings surprisingly well.
pedd
23 Nov 15#3
Looking to rebuild my desktop, I'd like it to be able to handle most games, but doesn't really have to be top settings. Would this do? Also, hoping to be able to stream games over Ethernet to other rooms (possibly using Steam Link), I believe that some graphics cards are better for that than others? In short, would this do me, or do I need to spend as much as a console to get that sort of functionality?
litwoojczyznomoj
23 Nov 158#2
I've played The Witcher 2 , Crysis2 on it and was pleased with the performance. Seen the videos ofWitcher 3 being played on it. Granted , not at the highest settings or fps but it doesnt bother me.
Purps
23 Nov 152#1
So your game list is candy crush type games on max settings?
Opening post
Memory Amount - 2048MB
Memory Interface - 128bit
DRAM Type - GDDR5
Graphics Clock Base Clock : 1085MHz / Boost Clock : 1163MHz
Memory Clock - 2750MHz (DDR 5500MHz)
CUDA Cores - 640
Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) - 88
NVIDIA 3D Vision Ready - Yes
NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology - Yes
NVIDIA PhysX-ready - Yes
NVIDIA CUDA Technology - Yes
NVIDIA GPU Boost - 2.0
NVIDIA Adaptive Vertical Sync - Yes
NVIDIA FXAA Technology - Yes
NVIDIA TXAA Technology - Yes
SMX - Yes
Microsoft DirectX - 11.2
OpenGL - 4.4
Bus Support - PCI-E 3.0 x 16
Certified for Microsoft Windows 7 - Yes
Certified for Microsoft Windows 8 - Yes
Maximum Digital Resolution - 4096x2160
Maximum VGA Resolution - 2048x1536
Dual-Link DVI - Yes
VGA - Yes
HDCP -Yes
HDMI - mHDMI
Height 2 Slot
Board Length - 166mm
PCB Width - 145mm x 112mm
Graphics Card Power - 60 W
Minimum Recommended System Power - 400 W
Accessory - Manual, Driver Disc
Top comments
Latest comments (25)
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-fallout-4-performance-analysis
You should get similar results if your using an i3 processor and slightly lower frame rates if using a dual core like the Pentium K G3258.
As others have said these won't allow playing at 4k but for casual games they're a great buy.
Also, personally I use AMD, Intel and NVIDIA graphics and I encounter more or less the same amount of problems with their respective drivers.
Eurogamers Digital Foundry team has some videos up featuring the GTX760Ti in Fallout 4.
GTX 750 Ti vs R7 360 - https://youtu.be/37CzgecyvTs
GTX 750 Ti vs PS4 vs Xbox One - https://youtu.be/iipDWbd6HNg
I've got the Gigabit low profile version - guess you can get a little more OC'ing from this with the larger fan.
Currently the Steam client on Windows for NVIDIA graphics is using NVIFR or NVFBC (more commonly known to you and I as the capture methods for NVIDIA Shadowplay). However the Steam beta client has just added support for NVENC (the dedicated hardware video encoder) and reading the comments from the Steam developers ( http://steamcommunity.com/groups/homestream/discussions/0/485622866444927070/#c485622866445135612 ) it seems like NVENC is the goal they are currently working towards.
If NVENC makes it to the live client then yes, a GTX 750 Ti would be a good choice of graphics card in the host machine. Since its a Maxwell based GPU with the 2nd gen NVENC hardware encoder inside which is very capable of 1080p encoding.