John Lewis price matched the samsung UE48J6300 Curved TV, and 5 year guarantee included
Currys dispatch 2-4 weeks, amazon out of stock, argos limited stock
Top comments
eslick to emiratesstadium
13 Oct 1517#7
That's not how the site works vote on the deal not your own preference and with the way 4K broadcasts are going you might as well wait for the next big thing to arrive. Way things are going 4K could end up being the Betamax of this generation :smiley:
brooky to chasolo
13 Oct 1516#11
Well if a TV show proved it then it must be true.
chasolo
13 Oct 1515#4
TV show proved curved TVs are just a gimmick so save your cash and get flat 4k TV instead.
dommyboy2
13 Oct 158#8
I think HD DVD was the betamax of this generation?
All comments (100)
Meladt
13 Oct 151#1
Nice price!
emiratesstadium
13 Oct 154#2
If this was 4k I would of gone into my overdraft for it. then again it probably be £200 more
eslick to emiratesstadium
13 Oct 1517#7
That's not how the site works vote on the deal not your own preference and with the way 4K broadcasts are going you might as well wait for the next big thing to arrive. Way things are going 4K could end up being the Betamax of this generation :smiley:
wutang81 to emiratesstadium
13 Oct 15#44
specialy when all channels in TV broadcasting in 4k quality
rofflespoffle to emiratesstadium
14 Oct 15#56
Of you seent one in person? I ofn't and am wondering what they look like.
Of you seent the 4X once?
suchitmehta7
13 Oct 15#3
not 4k. not a real deal for me. neither voting hot or cold
chasolo
13 Oct 1515#4
TV show proved curved TVs are just a gimmick so save your cash and get flat 4k TV instead.
brooky to chasolo
13 Oct 1516#11
Well if a TV show proved it then it must be true.
shadowdogg to chasolo
14 Oct 15#57
Karma proven true says TV Show.
DAZZ2000 to chasolo
14 Oct 15#59
superharber
13 Oct 155#5
Go for this one instead 4k and flat and price matched to 608 from crampton and Moore
Would this be a good monitor to play battlefield 4 on?
LOGiCALX to umirza85
13 Oct 151#15
You'll want a Sony for gaming my friend, lowest input lag! 43W709 or W756 or W809.
dommyboy2
13 Oct 158#8
I think HD DVD was the betamax of this generation?
kiish
13 Oct 15#9
Watched gadget show, showed curved is pretty pointless no wonder price has fallen from a year ago from being £1k+ for same size
amour3k to kiish
13 Oct 15#17
Hmmmmmmmm!, I DID kinda wonder bout this same thing really? .. & about 1.5 years ago a 50 inch 4k TV was knocking around the £10k price bracket?, with its 60 inch 4k equivalent knocking out at a FAT £20k!!!.
How 'times' have changed ... lol.
urbanlegend11 to kiish
14 Oct 153#64
Ah the "Gadget Show" the technical experts for this generation :smirk:
rickj
13 Oct 15#10
I've gone for 4k 55 inch curved smart tv .1249 js6510 but price matched to 979 from crampon moore by JL personally love the curved tv even if no viewing benefit. I think Jl should live up to their slogan and monitor prices better rather than piggybacking everyone's best prices to get the sale but 5 years warranty a must on any high price tv
Gollywood to rickj
13 Oct 156#12
I think you need to slow down or use more full stops!!
cache
13 Oct 153#13
I followed his response just fine without the need for improved grammar :smiley:
Regardless, the deal is hot, I for one won't be going for it though, as others have said, waiting for proper 4k
RuudBullit
13 Oct 15#14
4k is already available on youtube, netflix and amazon prime. bt have a uhd sports channel. sky will be next. you wait for the next big thing, you'll soon be left behind.
mamboboy
13 Oct 152#16
Agreed. 4K certainly isn't 3D/Betamax... those were new technologies that often struggle unless they immediately take off. 4K is just the natural progression from 1080p...
sundog
13 Oct 15#18
Not OLED, cold
reesycer to sundog
14 Oct 15#52
OLED is definitely the one. not in my price range though sadly.
wesker321
13 Oct 15#19
I purchased this tv from Groupon. It is an excellent tv well worth £500
PhilK
13 Oct 152#20
Correct. And as for the "gimmick" of curved screens - everythings a gimmick. Just whether it appeals or not. But 4k is already being priced out by the stupidity of not enough shows IN 4k, and you have to pay extra for those that are. And as the ordinary TV quality is more than good enough in 95% of TVs these days....
lydia74uk
13 Oct 15#21
The five year guarantee is a bonus with john Lewis :smiley:
Kam29
13 Oct 15#22
Hi..we get better deals on the boxin day!rite?pls suggest me guys
rickj
13 Oct 15#23
Thanks for your useful imput .Still jobsworths on this site.
McNabFish
13 Oct 15#24
Sky's HD is still only 720p, you'll be waiting a while for then to give you 4k :confused:
cford2010
13 Oct 151#25
it's a good deal because it's cheaper than most other shops and it's got JL guarantee. if you want 4k then dont buy it but really will it make much difference on a 48 inch tv
sundog
13 Oct 15#26
Is BT broadcasting in 4k or UHD?
TIA
McNabFish
13 Oct 15#27
Hotukdeals you've done it again. I have been debating upgrading my 7yo 32" 1080i Samsung lounge TV and you've pushed me over the edge.
Stop finding me deals on stuff I didn't know I wanted, good job I get my bonus this month :smile:
TALON1973
13 Oct 15#28
just subscribed to Netflix to try out some 4k viewing .... watch a quick 5 minute blast of some of the shows in 4k . Even on my 40" Samsung ue40ju6550 it blows everything else out of the water picture wise
Thats what everyone said when I purchased my 3D tv
RuudBullit
13 Oct 151#31
its a touch different. 3d was never going to be the normal way of watching tv. 4k, or uhd will be. like someone has already stated, its just the natural progression in picture quality.
DelBoy_Tr0tt3r
13 Oct 15#32
Not curved but there is a 48" Samsung UHD (4K) at Argos for £599, personally I think the curved screens are a bit of a gimmick and can be awkward at wider viewing angles, though they do look nice on a larger screen.
Fallen1992
13 Oct 151#33
Agreed. 4K also has the advantage of upscaling regular video content, so it's not like it's not like it's as exclusive as 3D was when it first came out. 4K will simply become the standard for picture quality, and as the manufacturing process comes down, they will become as widespread as full HD's.
Melbury
13 Oct 15#34
Is Samsung better than Panasonic now? Everyone seems to be singing their praises.
TwistedNerve to Melbury
13 Oct 152#36
you will never get better than a panasonic plasma, but sadly there's been none since 2014 and will never be another :disappointed:
...until oled sorts itself out that is
leon121
13 Oct 15#35
Good deal especially with 5 year warranty
stressedman
13 Oct 15#37
I've heard rumours samsung and lg might be using vestel panels in the smallest tvs but didn't find anything the last time i googled it.
4k will be replaced by 8k when they decide what to call it. they are already developing it in japan.
curved is a gimmick like 3d. it does look great on a massive screen, but only if you have the room large enough for it!
Jonwilkie
13 Oct 15#38
Quidco available?
Gengar
13 Oct 15#39
Wow, killer deal.
Gengar
13 Oct 15#40
Just signed up to ask a question as thinking of buying.
Someone mentioned vestal panels. What is a vestal panel and is that good or bad?
superharber
13 Oct 15#41
Just pay the extra 100 pound and get the UE48JU6400 which is 4k - also with John Lewis
Personally, I cannot tell the difference between 1080P & 4K from distances where I find a TV comfortable to watch. Sure, if I stand 4 or 5 feet away things look nicer (when there is no motion), but I wouldn't pay hundreds extra for it.
..and my eyesight is fine.
asiot to Orville
14 Oct 151#58
my girlfriend can't even tell the difference between standard and high definition, thats probably why she finds me attractive too
sureshot
13 Oct 151#47
All the HD broadcasts are in 1080i
FTCom
13 Oct 153#48
Can this do colour?
zoopakev
13 Oct 151#49
stonker of a bargain, hopefully all the people whining about the curve go back under their rock and allow proper bargain hunters to get these bought
vindico
13 Oct 151#50
I believe Sky HD broadcasts are in 1080i format.
Bikerdanny
14 Oct 15#51
Good deal this even if it isn't a 4k TV, I'm personally holding out and hoping my current 6 year old LCD will last until I can get a 50" OLED 4k TV for around £500 :b
reesycer
14 Oct 15#53
you generally have to pay extra for 1080p... so you not think HD is gonna catch on? oh wait..
reesycer
14 Oct 152#54
I recently bought an LG 4k. for about 1k. nothing like rinsing a grand on a telly to come home and be forced to watch bulls eye on challenge TV from 1984 on my 4k TV :smile:
Daredevil & Narcos in 4k though
threesixty360
14 Oct 151#55
No thanks! My Panasonic plasma is still going strong. Heat added though, great reviews!
dansax
14 Oct 154#60
I don't think anyone can safely say that 4k is a gimmick. It's an obvious incremental upgrade from 1080p which has been standard for years now.
Having said that, if you honestly think that now is a good time to be buying a 4k TV you need your head looking at. Panels get cheaper when they're mass produced. They're mass produced when demand is high. Demand is high when the content is there to support the hardware. The content isn't there, and whatever sky, bt, Netflix etc are doing is very nice, but it doesn't mean all, or even a significant part of their programming will be in 4k. It also doesn't mean you'll be able to actually get those channels in 4k.
4k isn't relevant in 2015. It won't be relievant in 2016 either. Sure if you have the cash, it's a moot point. If you don't, you'd be better upgrading to a cheaper, better quality 1080p panel and waiting for the inevitable crash in prices in a few years time.
Dodger21
14 Oct 153#61
When shopping for a new TV last year in Curry’s, there was a Sony technical rep in the shop and I had a chat with him about 4K TV’s.
The shop ones have the picture sent from a HD under the display unit, they need a constant 36Mbit stream to show true 4K, Sony have had 4K media dating back to the second world war, so the recording technology has been around for a long time, when I spoke to him the PS4 was the only device capable (with new software) of playing 4K from a disc and all the internet media is a compressed format and not true 4K.
Sky can’t even transmit a true HD picture and even then they use Qam modulation, which means the full frame, is not updated continuously, hence while you see some fast moving objects breakup as they move across the screen, which you don’t get on Freeview HD.
So true 4K isn’t going to be transmitted any time soon, most people couldn’t tell from 8 feet away anyway between 4K and HD. The only way to get this would be to have fibre to the home and even then the amount of date needing to be sent would limit to the odd film.
Having said all that to see an uncompressed 4K picture close up really take things to a new level but don’t hold your breath for it being shown in general.
So curved screens and 4K are both gimmicks.
DAZZ2000 to Dodger21
14 Oct 15#71
It's an interesting story bro :stuck_out_tongue:
Some valid points made here. I would suggest though that blu-Ray producers are going to kickstart the 4k ramp-up with a likely influx of 4k disc based media for now. Anything streamed though, as you say, will likely be too heavily compressed to be considered worthwhile in 4k over 1080p. Give it a few more years and when more of us are enjoying super fast broadband speeds, a la Virgin media, I can see the likes of your Netflix etc offering up better quality 4k streams.
Right now 4k is still an early adopter entry point though and, unless you're a PC gamer or 4k content downloader, content is going to be generally quite limited for a while longer yet.
Curved screens on the other hand are indeed a gimmick!. Give me 3D over curved any day of the week. Some of these manufacturer's R&D departments don't half need reigning in!.
McNabFish
14 Oct 15#62
I've just had a cancellation email?
McNabFish to McNabFish
14 Oct 15#79
False alarm, there was a problem with PayPal apparently... Being delivered Tuesday!
Chz
14 Oct 15#63
For those of us who care about the picture fidelity more than 4k or curved screens... Is this edge lit or backlit?
Scorpion
14 Oct 151#65
?!?! Outdated? How much 4k content is out there? The odd series on Netflix and BT doing a very occasional broadcast in 4k. That's about your lot. Next month the first of the 4k blu-ray players come out, albeit with a £2,000 price tag and severely limited content.
The experience of what happened when HD was released suggests that we're going to be waiting at least another couple of years before 4k becomes anywhere near normal. In that time TV technology will have moved along so fast that any 4k TV purchased now will be pitiful compared to buying one in a couple of years for the same money.
In summary, unless you're going to keep your TV for years, and plan to get 4k content immediately then buying a 4k TV really isn't the smart move. A cheap 1080p TV will be absolutely fine for quite some time yet, afterall, the HD footage fed to your TVs by the likes of BBC HD & Sky still isn't 1080p, it's 1080i.
Scorpion
14 Oct 15#66
Interesting that it'll support that. Sony have already confirmed that the PS4 won't be able to do 4k games. If it's true about the PS4 playing 4k blu-ray, then it'll be the cheapest 4k blu-ray player by some margin, as stand alone machines are going to cost a couple of grand when they're released in Japan next month.
Dodger21
14 Oct 15#67
Well as I said that was the information given to me but it’s possible Sony have seen an option to make more money by selling at a higher price.
kiish
14 Oct 15#68
Don't need technical experts to compare what their eyes saw or rather multiple public members along with the technical crap they did with the TVs.
The price now and the price just 6 months ago speaks for itself on all curved tvs.
Russ71
14 Oct 153#69
Hi all.
I've previously looked at this TV and agree its a great TV at a great price. However, I opted for the 4K Flat model UE48JU6400 which I got price matched with JL for collection at £599 (see my post earlier this month) Your text here .
Like many, I was suspicious of both curved screens and 4K as the latest gimmicks. I did plenty of web research and talked with a couple of people in the industry - concluded that curved screen is not worth it, but that 4K definitely is worth it. Personally, I was looking for a screen that minimised glare as due to the shape of our lounge the TV has to be situated near a big window - not ideal. Curved screens are supposed to help in this, but the curved screens I looked at in stores actually did the opposite - e.g. the refection a store spotlight actually stretched across a bigger area (think of a fairground mirror effect).
However, the feedback re 4K is that even though broadcasts are minimal at the moment & services like BT are charging silly monthly subscriptions, they will become far more commonplace and much cheaper within the next 2-3 years - as is the case with all new technology eventually. The leap from HD to 4K is no way as much of a seismic shift as was SD to HD, but I decided that, as I'm buying a TV for the next 5 years+ I wanted to future-proof it as much as possible, whilst enjoying improved picture quality as 4K services expanded.
Having had the UE48JU6400 for a couple of weeks now, I'm confident I made the right choice. The 4K pictures are stunning and the full HD pictures are amazing too - I'm by nature a skeptic, but I would even say that the mystical/dubious "upscaling" makes a genuine difference. For a few months I owned a new LG 42 inch 4K TV (LG42UB820V) which upscaled diddly squat & I was always re-calibrating as it never got a great picture across all sources. Despite being entry level & a bigger screen, the Samsung UE48JU6400 is without doubt a class apart in all areas - picture quality, sound, OS, apps - better in every way. The only slight niggle is loss of contrast at very wide viewing angles, but none of us in the family sit at such an angle for it to be an issue, and such problems are fairly common in all entry level TVs too (inc the curved models I viewed in stores).
Happy deal hunting comrades!
captainbeaky
14 Oct 15#70
Haven't the EU banned curved TVs yet?
Gollywood
14 Oct 15#72
Does That F1 lass still present it?
superharber
14 Oct 15#73
nice review mate! :smiley:
ive just had the same TV as you had price matched and have been deciding whether to go for it, or the 6800 50 inch from Currys and whether the near 200 pound is worth spending on the 6800 or stick to my price match like you say above for the 6400 - your review had made me think that the 6400 is good enough and ill go for that from John Lewis :smiley:
TwistedNerve
14 Oct 15#74
nope, they've had some A grade clunge in the last few years, Polyanna Woodward and Rachel Riley etc., but now the female member (if you don't count Ortis) is Olympian Amy Williams... looks good in a bikini
Please please please can no one mention a lighthouse.
Try putting the tv in a corner instead
fay28
14 Oct 15#78
Anyone got the link for the wall bracket for this tv
geraldfitzsimons
14 Oct 15#80
who cares 4 k! nice tv
Melbury
14 Oct 15#81
I agree, we have got a Panasonic plasma TV that is 8 years old and still got a really good picture. Why have they stopped making plasma TV's? We have an LED in the kitchen and if you look at it from the side the picture is very faint - you have to basically be viewing from exactly in front of it.
davidbr
14 Oct 15#82
Don't but any thing from Debenhams. there customer service is terrible. when my laptop broke they said I had to go back to Lenovo.
davelambs
14 Oct 15#83
They stopped making plasma because they were more expensive to produce and most people didn't understand that they had a better picture.
AV_Installer
14 Oct 153#84
Some interesting points. I do this for a living, as such have first hand experience from many installs. As a rule, I advise based on what I clients need, so he're is my input (but still it's just my opinion)
Curved TV's exist because they can, this business is geared to churn sales, on the wall? I think they look ugly, around 30mm at the back and around 70mm (iirc) at the sides, they kinda look ok in corners. If you think curved TV's are for you, go for it, it's your money, personally I'd never buy one.
If clients need a new TV, I do now recommend 4k, but mostly because the average client will keep the TV for 4-5 years at least, and currently their are some good 4k deals, yes "content is king" there is content here now, but a lot more coming, but if your not likely change TV's you will be ready, provided you're willing to pay a premium, 4k is pay service for the foreseeable future.
If you think 4Ks a waste of money, great save your cash buy the best 1080P product you can afford, but only if you need a new set, if not, save even more cash and upgrade in a couple of years, when content and service costs are clearer. Personally I'd consider 4k when HDR is standard across many brands and clarity on content supporting HDR.
Don't get too wrapped infrastructure (bandwidth) right now, it will improve (ok it can be a broadband lottery in many parts)
Because I work in the industry I also so get invited to see what's going on in development, their's no doubt a massive surge in 4k from content providers coming, and to be blunt it's down to a belief that premium services will sell and make money. So it's not so much about content, but are you willing to pay for it. I have seen some truly stunning 4k conversions of classic material that will amaze you.
Oh OLED, LG's 65" models are impressive, however at 4k I'd prefer support for HDR before I'd drop £5,000 on the counter (flat version not curved of course)
As always it's your cash do as you see fit
crazybaz
14 Oct 15#85
bought thanks pal
pboo26
15 Oct 151#86
Fat bloke down the pub told me exactly the same, so it must be true.
exexpat
16 Oct 15#87
Yes I saw 9/11 on TV too so that has to be true yes?
poinsy
17 Oct 15#88
£549 now :disappointed:
poinsy
17 Oct 15#89
Just noticed this is £499 in Richer Sounds also, and they give a 6 year guarantee. The 4K version is £749. Might look good in my corner...
Nesima
18 Oct 15#90
Thought about this for a week, pulled the trigger on ordering one from Richer Sounds with the 6 year guarantee.
The TV has 5 star reviews everywhere at £700, Richer Sounds cusstomer service is second to none based on my own previous experience. My current Samsung TV is from John Lewis their 5 year guarantee for TVs is also good, had to use it just the once, all sorted within a week.
poinsy to Nesima
18 Oct 15#91
It would be great if you could provide some feedback when you get it. I am just wondering whether the extra is worth it for the 4K version, being as there is currently so little content, but over the next 6 years there may be.
Nesima
18 Oct 151#92
Ok will do.
My thinking is for £500 this will do me for the next 6 years (length of warranty), so £83 a year.
We will then see where we are with 4k content or the next big thing, perhaps 4D with an implant in your head ;-)
I have just come back from Currys, they have the 4k version of this 48" Curved Samsung, (£750) plus a 'nano crystal' (got to laugh) 48" Curved Samsung (£1500). so I will try and compare the three.
planthead
18 Oct 151#93
Or Igloos
mojuice
18 Oct 15#94
Lighthouse
JVOC
20 Oct 15#95
4K isn't visible on TVs under 60" unless you are sitting with 3-4 feet; and there is next to nothing broadcast in it. Manufacturers push it because it's cheaper to make type of glass, and it's cheaper than faster motion updates, contrast etc.
It's a good deal. Richer sounds are doing it at the same price with a free 6 year warranty. Picked one up last week, more than happy.
brooky to JVOC
21 Oct 15#96
have you configured your picture settings at all? I've set it to natural at the moment which seems decent, but wondering if there's a better setting
JVOC
21 Oct 151#97
I followed the settings in their set up video here:
Was watching a Bluray yesterday and the screen went black periodically for 2 to 3 seconds. Happened about 6 times in total at random times.
Catsy
30 Oct 15#99
549 its the actual price....
poinsy
31 Oct 15#100
I bit the bullet and bought the 4K version. John Lewis are doing a bundle deal with the soundbar, essentially knocking an extra £300 off. The picture is stunning, just on Sky HD. It is also a thing of beauty. In a corner it looks superb, no nasty reflections for me. And, surprisingly, the TV sound is very good.
Opening post
Currys dispatch 2-4 weeks, amazon out of stock, argos limited stock
Top comments
That's not how the site works vote on the deal not your own preference and with the way 4K broadcasts are going you might as well wait for the next big thing to arrive. Way things are going 4K could end up being the Betamax of this generation :smiley:
All comments (100)
That's not how the site works vote on the deal not your own preference and with the way 4K broadcasts are going you might as well wait for the next big thing to arrive. Way things are going 4K could end up being the Betamax of this generation :smiley:
Of you seent the 4X once?
http://m.johnlewis.com/mt/www.johnlewis.com/samsung-ue48ju6400-led-4k-ultra-hd-smart-tv-48-with-freeview-hd-and-built-in-wi-fi/p1929338?sku=234304447&kpid=234304447&s_kenid=12722f3b-3d6d-7089-ba27-000053c94772&s_kwcid=402x346578&tmad=c&tmcampid=73#page_loaded
How 'times' have changed ... lol.
Regardless, the deal is hot, I for one won't be going for it though, as others have said, waiting for proper 4k
TIA
Stop finding me deals on stuff I didn't know I wanted, good job I get my bonus this month :smile:
...until oled sorts itself out that is
4k will be replaced by 8k when they decide what to call it. they are already developing it in japan.
curved is a gimmick like 3d. it does look great on a massive screen, but only if you have the room large enough for it!
Someone mentioned vestal panels. What is a vestal panel and is that good or bad?
Samsung UE48JU6400 48 Inch Smart 4K Ultra HD LED TV (UE48JU6400KXXU)
SAVE 40%
Samsung UE48JU6400 48 Inch Smart 4K Ultra HD LED TV
View larger image
Samsung UE48JU6400 48 Inch Smart 4K Ultra HD LED TV
You save : £420.00
£629.00
..and my eyesight is fine.
Daredevil & Narcos in 4k though
Having said that, if you honestly think that now is a good time to be buying a 4k TV you need your head looking at. Panels get cheaper when they're mass produced. They're mass produced when demand is high. Demand is high when the content is there to support the hardware. The content isn't there, and whatever sky, bt, Netflix etc are doing is very nice, but it doesn't mean all, or even a significant part of their programming will be in 4k. It also doesn't mean you'll be able to actually get those channels in 4k.
4k isn't relevant in 2015. It won't be relievant in 2016 either. Sure if you have the cash, it's a moot point. If you don't, you'd be better upgrading to a cheaper, better quality 1080p panel and waiting for the inevitable crash in prices in a few years time.
The shop ones have the picture sent from a HD under the display unit, they need a constant 36Mbit stream to show true 4K, Sony have had 4K media dating back to the second world war, so the recording technology has been around for a long time, when I spoke to him the PS4 was the only device capable (with new software) of playing 4K from a disc and all the internet media is a compressed format and not true 4K.
Sky can’t even transmit a true HD picture and even then they use Qam modulation, which means the full frame, is not updated continuously, hence while you see some fast moving objects breakup as they move across the screen, which you don’t get on Freeview HD.
So true 4K isn’t going to be transmitted any time soon, most people couldn’t tell from 8 feet away anyway between 4K and HD. The only way to get this would be to have fibre to the home and even then the amount of date needing to be sent would limit to the odd film.
Having said all that to see an uncompressed 4K picture close up really take things to a new level but don’t hold your breath for it being shown in general.
So curved screens and 4K are both gimmicks.
Some valid points made here. I would suggest though that blu-Ray producers are going to kickstart the 4k ramp-up with a likely influx of 4k disc based media for now. Anything streamed though, as you say, will likely be too heavily compressed to be considered worthwhile in 4k over 1080p. Give it a few more years and when more of us are enjoying super fast broadband speeds, a la Virgin media, I can see the likes of your Netflix etc offering up better quality 4k streams.
Right now 4k is still an early adopter entry point though and, unless you're a PC gamer or 4k content downloader, content is going to be generally quite limited for a while longer yet.
Curved screens on the other hand are indeed a gimmick!. Give me 3D over curved any day of the week. Some of these manufacturer's R&D departments don't half need reigning in!.
The experience of what happened when HD was released suggests that we're going to be waiting at least another couple of years before 4k becomes anywhere near normal. In that time TV technology will have moved along so fast that any 4k TV purchased now will be pitiful compared to buying one in a couple of years for the same money.
In summary, unless you're going to keep your TV for years, and plan to get 4k content immediately then buying a 4k TV really isn't the smart move. A cheap 1080p TV will be absolutely fine for quite some time yet, afterall, the HD footage fed to your TVs by the likes of BBC HD & Sky still isn't 1080p, it's 1080i.
The price now and the price just 6 months ago speaks for itself on all curved tvs.
I've previously looked at this TV and agree its a great TV at a great price. However, I opted for the 4K Flat model UE48JU6400 which I got price matched with JL for collection at £599 (see my post earlier this month) Your text here .
Like many, I was suspicious of both curved screens and 4K as the latest gimmicks. I did plenty of web research and talked with a couple of people in the industry - concluded that curved screen is not worth it, but that 4K definitely is worth it. Personally, I was looking for a screen that minimised glare as due to the shape of our lounge the TV has to be situated near a big window - not ideal. Curved screens are supposed to help in this, but the curved screens I looked at in stores actually did the opposite - e.g. the refection a store spotlight actually stretched across a bigger area (think of a fairground mirror effect).
However, the feedback re 4K is that even though broadcasts are minimal at the moment & services like BT are charging silly monthly subscriptions, they will become far more commonplace and much cheaper within the next 2-3 years - as is the case with all new technology eventually. The leap from HD to 4K is no way as much of a seismic shift as was SD to HD, but I decided that, as I'm buying a TV for the next 5 years+ I wanted to future-proof it as much as possible, whilst enjoying improved picture quality as 4K services expanded.
Having had the UE48JU6400 for a couple of weeks now, I'm confident I made the right choice. The 4K pictures are stunning and the full HD pictures are amazing too - I'm by nature a skeptic, but I would even say that the mystical/dubious "upscaling" makes a genuine difference. For a few months I owned a new LG 42 inch 4K TV (LG42UB820V) which upscaled diddly squat & I was always re-calibrating as it never got a great picture across all sources. Despite being entry level & a bigger screen, the Samsung UE48JU6400 is without doubt a class apart in all areas - picture quality, sound, OS, apps - better in every way. The only slight niggle is loss of contrast at very wide viewing angles, but none of us in the family sit at such an angle for it to be an issue, and such problems are fairly common in all entry level TVs too (inc the curved models I viewed in stores).
Happy deal hunting comrades!
ive just had the same TV as you had price matched and have been deciding whether to go for it, or the 6800 50 inch from Currys and whether the near 200 pound is worth spending on the 6800 or stick to my price match like you say above for the 6400 - your review had made me think that the 6400 is good enough and ill go for that from John Lewis :smiley:
http://www.johnlewis.com/sony-bravia-kdl48w705c-led-hd-1080p-smart-tv-48-with-freeview-hd-and-built-in-wi-fi/p1919503
Try putting the tv in a corner instead
Curved TV's exist because they can, this business is geared to churn sales, on the wall? I think they look ugly, around 30mm at the back and around 70mm (iirc) at the sides, they kinda look ok in corners. If you think curved TV's are for you, go for it, it's your money, personally I'd never buy one.
If clients need a new TV, I do now recommend 4k, but mostly because the average client will keep the TV for 4-5 years at least, and currently their are some good 4k deals, yes "content is king" there is content here now, but a lot more coming, but if your not likely change TV's you will be ready, provided you're willing to pay a premium, 4k is pay service for the foreseeable future.
If you think 4Ks a waste of money, great save your cash buy the best 1080P product you can afford, but only if you need a new set, if not, save even more cash and upgrade in a couple of years, when content and service costs are clearer. Personally I'd consider 4k when HDR is standard across many brands and clarity on content supporting HDR.
Don't get too wrapped infrastructure (bandwidth) right now, it will improve (ok it can be a broadband lottery in many parts)
Because I work in the industry I also so get invited to see what's going on in development, their's no doubt a massive surge in 4k from content providers coming, and to be blunt it's down to a belief that premium services will sell and make money. So it's not so much about content, but are you willing to pay for it. I have seen some truly stunning 4k conversions of classic material that will amaze you.
Oh OLED, LG's 65" models are impressive, however at 4k I'd prefer support for HDR before I'd drop £5,000 on the counter (flat version not curved of course)
As always it's your cash do as you see fit
The TV has 5 star reviews everywhere at £700, Richer Sounds cusstomer service is second to none based on my own previous experience. My current Samsung TV is from John Lewis their 5 year guarantee for TVs is also good, had to use it just the once, all sorted within a week.
My thinking is for £500 this will do me for the next 6 years (length of warranty), so £83 a year.
We will then see where we are with 4k content or the next big thing, perhaps 4D with an implant in your head ;-)
I have just come back from Currys, they have the 4k version of this 48" Curved Samsung, (£750) plus a 'nano crystal' (got to laugh) 48" Curved Samsung (£1500). so I will try and compare the three.
It's a good deal. Richer sounds are doing it at the same price with a free 6 year warranty. Picked one up last week, more than happy.
https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-ue48j6300-tv-review.11662
Was watching a Bluray yesterday and the screen went black periodically for 2 to 3 seconds. Happened about 6 times in total at random times.