The AOC i2476Vwm display will impress the most demanding users. This 23.6-inch ADS-IPS screen has Full HD 1920 x 1080 resolution for brilliantly detailed movies and images with wide 178 degree viewing. Gamers will appreciated the fast 5ms response time that reduces ghosting and blur, and 50M:1 dynamic contrast offers rich, true blacks. Hook up your computer, laptop or game console with the built-in VGA and HDMI connectors. The stylish black finish and ultra-slim profile make it an elegant accent to your office or living room, while the VESA mount lets you hang it on the wall. The i2476Vwm display is the ideal choice for anyone who wants the ultimate image quality and performance at an attractive price.
Main Features:
Inputs: D-SUB, HDMI
1920 x 1080 maximum resolution
Special Features: -4/21.5 Tilt,Audio out,Eco Mode,e-Saver,i-Menu,Kensington Security Lock,MHL,screen+,VESA 100 mm
250 cd/m
5 ms GTG
Top comments
colsey85 to rp123
25 Oct 154#14
How do you figure that??? a pint over 100quid for an ips is a bargain.
Good find, have some heat.
PsychoSonny
25 Oct 153#12
ips panels are the best for movies.
for kids homework any panel will do unless your kid is at university studying animation, art, etc.
U2414H is what I use because it's IPS with very low lagg for gaming and pc use.
This AOC panel for people who have no clue about monitors is probably the best they can get for the money. I remember my first IPS panel cost me like £350+ and was only 21 inch (NEC) and highly regarded as one of the best panels made for like 5+ years.
IPS > VA > TN
in terms of picture quality but some VA panels are ridiculously good these days and on par with IPS and sometimes even better but you will need to do your research into what ones on tft central.
decent. using a dell and the closest to it would be this bargain buy here. heat
rsb to hellop4nda
25 Oct 15#4
Which one do you have plz any links n price?
Dave_dave69
25 Oct 15#3
Free delivery
hellop4nda
25 Oct 15#5
U2414H and P2414H but these two are far more expensive than this AOC monitor
vdey
25 Oct 15#6
4 p more at Amazon.
kha27
25 Oct 15#7
I am after a monitor is this a good price?
kha27
25 Oct 15#8
More importantly is this a good monitor?
xela333 to kha27
25 Oct 15#9
Depends what you want to use it for? Gaming? Editing?
kha27
25 Oct 15#10
For kids homework and watching a movie
hellop4nda to kha27
25 Oct 152#11
More than satisfactory.
PsychoSonny
25 Oct 153#12
ips panels are the best for movies.
for kids homework any panel will do unless your kid is at university studying animation, art, etc.
U2414H is what I use because it's IPS with very low lagg for gaming and pc use.
This AOC panel for people who have no clue about monitors is probably the best they can get for the money. I remember my first IPS panel cost me like £350+ and was only 21 inch (NEC) and highly regarded as one of the best panels made for like 5+ years.
IPS > VA > TN
in terms of picture quality but some VA panels are ridiculously good these days and on par with IPS and sometimes even better but you will need to do your research into what ones on tft central.
Rid1 to PsychoSonny
25 Oct 15#19
So where does TFT come into play? (I don't know an awful lot about monitors)
rp123
25 Oct 15#13
good but expensive
colsey85 to rp123
25 Oct 154#14
How do you figure that??? a pint over 100quid for an ips is a bargain.
Good find, have some heat.
Mikuru
25 Oct 15#15
Using a 2369VM here, advertised as 60hz but happy to go to 75hz, assume this may be the same. Stand is a bit crap & monitor takes a bit of tweaking but a good monitor nonetheless.
spannerzone to Mikuru
25 Oct 15#16
I've got that monitor, very pleased with it, gives excellent results but it's about £30 more than this one.... but for me I'd always go for IPS (not a gamer)
gerardarmstrong5
25 Oct 15#17
How about for gaming and photo editing?
hellop4nda
25 Oct 151#18
For photo editing you would aim to have an IPS because of its viewing angles (almost no colour shift when you view the screen from different angles) vs TN (which is ****, period).
Gaming, you'd aim for a TN because of its faster refresh rates but I game on an IPS and I don't really notice a difference (not that I am a serious gamer though) and lately the differences between refresh rates between both classes.
Wouldn't hurt to do a little research of your own, recently introduced models have been getting better and better in overcoming each classes' deficiencies.
While the viewing angles are better with IPS technology, the main appeal for photo/video editing is the wider range of colour reproduction.
Mikuru
26 Oct 151#22
I managed to snag it a few weeks back for £114.99 & seemed a steal at that, considering it has a display port too
(Nice If I ever decide to daisy chain monitors). Even though it's an IPS I do feel it's not as good as my 4/5 year old Dell TN pannel (as a gamer), but i guess I'd grown accustomed to that after all these years.
gerardarmstrong5
26 Oct 15#23
5ms seems fine, was considering picking it up but noticed it only has HDMI and vga ports so it won't be ideal for a triple monitor set up :disappointed:
Maverick85
26 Oct 151#24
I'd err on that. OLED are best for movies. The black levels on IPS are not that good.
alexanderthenotsogreat
26 Oct 15#25
Technical question. Having a smaller monitor, would games running on XB1 in 720 upscaled to 1080p look less messy and murky compared to my 32" LED TV? Sounds like a silly question, but Hardline looks horrible on the 32" and it's so difficult to see anything during driving sections
TesseractOrion
26 Oct 15#26
OLED PC monitors are taking a while to arrive (off topic I know) whereas they're getting more common as TVs for whatever reason, yields and marketing I guess...
When do you think OLED monitors will become prevalent? They should make all previous TFT technologies obsolete I'd guess? Maybe that's why vendors want to make full use of their R&D in IPS and get rid of inventory before embarking on what should be a paradigm shift (I hate that phrase, but I suppose it fits :stuck_out_tongue:) in displays...
Dave_dave69
26 Oct 15#27
Now only £103.93 inc VAT
Rid1
26 Oct 15#28
I have no idea what this means, that's why I asked you xD
PsychoSonny
26 Oct 15#29
oled monitors won't take off at all
screen burn is an issue as is the colours get weaker the more they are used.
so basically OLED much like plasma is great for tv and movies. terrible for gaming or pc's with static images.
or if you spend a lot of time watching a channel with a logo it's not for you either.
hellop4nda
26 Oct 15#30
That is a bummer. Then again, such is the case with most deals on this site, gotta fit the bill to walk away with a deal most of the time
TesseractOrion
27 Oct 15#31
Damn. I did not know that. :disappointed:
Dave_dave69
27 Oct 15#32
now £104.98
buddy1976
28 Oct 15#33
So how about me and many others using their OLED tv as their main pc monitor, are you saying it wont last long? i thought the built in burn protection prevented this from happening? and oled technology should last as long as today's LCD or LED TVs – 60,000 hours; which when you break it down to 4 hours a day of viewing is 41 years.
PsychoSonny
28 Oct 15#34
hahahhaa 41 years brilliant.
if it lasts more than 20 i'll buy you your next tv.
regardless of use tv's will never last anywhere near those quoted hours. and i think you will find it's probably 60,000 hours until the amount of light emitted from the oled's has halved. much like plasma.
are you using it on your pc to do pc work or watch movies? static images (images which don't move) are extremely bad for OLED.
buddy1976
28 Oct 15#35
hahahhaa 41 years brilliant.
if it lasts more than 20 i'll buy you your next tv.
blue OLEDs historically have had a lifetime of around 14,000 hours to half original brightness (five years at 8 hours a day) when used for flat-panel displays. This is lower than the typical lifetime of LCD, LED or PDP technology. Each currently is rated for about 25,000–40,000 hours to half brightness, depending on manufacturer and model.
you better get your glasses on
buddy1976
31 Oct 15#37
HISTORICALLY........pfft do some research on todays mainstream oled panels, the ones being used tv's today. your the one with poorly peepers sonny!
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Main Features:
Inputs: D-SUB, HDMI
1920 x 1080 maximum resolution
Special Features: -4/21.5 Tilt,Audio out,Eco Mode,e-Saver,i-Menu,Kensington Security Lock,MHL,screen+,VESA 100 mm
250 cd/m
5 ms GTG
Top comments
Good find, have some heat.
for kids homework any panel will do unless your kid is at university studying animation, art, etc.
U2414H is what I use because it's IPS with very low lagg for gaming and pc use.
This AOC panel for people who have no clue about monitors is probably the best they can get for the money. I remember my first IPS panel cost me like £350+ and was only 21 inch (NEC) and highly regarded as one of the best panels made for like 5+ years.
IPS > VA > TN
in terms of picture quality but some VA panels are ridiculously good these days and on par with IPS and sometimes even better but you will need to do your research into what ones on tft central.
All comments (37)
Previously was £113.11
Depends what you want to use it for? Gaming? Editing?
for kids homework any panel will do unless your kid is at university studying animation, art, etc.
U2414H is what I use because it's IPS with very low lagg for gaming and pc use.
This AOC panel for people who have no clue about monitors is probably the best they can get for the money. I remember my first IPS panel cost me like £350+ and was only 21 inch (NEC) and highly regarded as one of the best panels made for like 5+ years.
IPS > VA > TN
in terms of picture quality but some VA panels are ridiculously good these days and on par with IPS and sometimes even better but you will need to do your research into what ones on tft central.
Good find, have some heat.
Gaming, you'd aim for a TN because of its faster refresh rates but I game on an IPS and I don't really notice a difference (not that I am a serious gamer though) and lately the differences between refresh rates between both classes.
Wouldn't hurt to do a little research of your own, recently introduced models have been getting better and better in overcoming each classes' deficiencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film-transistor_liquid-crystal_display
" Types
3.1 Twisted nematic (TN)
3.2 In-Plane Switching (IPS)
3.3 Advanced fringe field switching (AFFS)
3.4 Multi-domain vertical alignment (MVA)
3.5 Patterned vertical alignment (PVA)
3.6 Advanced super view (ASV)
3.7 Plane Line Switching (PLS)
3.8 TFT dual-transistor pixel (DTP) or cell technology"
(Nice If I ever decide to daisy chain monitors). Even though it's an IPS I do feel it's not as good as my 4/5 year old Dell TN pannel (as a gamer), but i guess I'd grown accustomed to that after all these years.
When do you think OLED monitors will become prevalent? They should make all previous TFT technologies obsolete I'd guess? Maybe that's why vendors want to make full use of their R&D in IPS and get rid of inventory before embarking on what should be a paradigm shift (I hate that phrase, but I suppose it fits :stuck_out_tongue:) in displays...
screen burn is an issue as is the colours get weaker the more they are used.
so basically OLED much like plasma is great for tv and movies. terrible for gaming or pc's with static images.
or if you spend a lot of time watching a channel with a logo it's not for you either.
if it lasts more than 20 i'll buy you your next tv.
regardless of use tv's will never last anywhere near those quoted hours. and i think you will find it's probably 60,000 hours until the amount of light emitted from the oled's has halved. much like plasma.
are you using it on your pc to do pc work or watch movies? static images (images which don't move) are extremely bad for OLED.
if it lasts more than 20 i'll buy you your next tv.
a quick google would tell you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED
you better get your glasses on