Going live on 24th February. On there now for £359.99, but will be £249.99. It's not 3D, it's probably made by Goodmans, it's not 1000hz, it's not a plasma, it's lag is probably bad for gaming, there's not a lot of 4k content... Etc etc...
But £250 for a 43"UHD 4k smart TV seems pretty good to me!
Just spotted this online without coming here first. Have ordered online for delivery this afternoon so will review later if anyone still wants to know what it is actually like rather than presuming what it is like.
ryanrob89
23 Feb 1620#1
Excellent description. Heat added
the1stcoke to ashmac
23 Feb 1618#5
It's the same price as the 1080p version. It displays moving pictures, and has sound. I'd imagine it works pretty well as a basic, cheap TV. At a cheap price. Pointless is a little harsh and a lot ignorant. The reviews are really good at a higher price.
All comments (228)
ryanrob89
23 Feb 1620#1
Excellent description. Heat added
ashmac
23 Feb 163#2
this is the same as buying a choc fire guard and a bucket with a hole in .
ashmac
23 Feb 16#3
pointless :laughing:
the1stcoke to ashmac
23 Feb 1618#5
It's the same price as the 1080p version. It displays moving pictures, and has sound. I'd imagine it works pretty well as a basic, cheap TV. At a cheap price. Pointless is a little harsh and a lot ignorant. The reviews are really good at a higher price.
Maxow
23 Feb 162#4
You certainly talk up this tv!
the1stcoke to Maxow
23 Feb 1613#6
Ha ha I was trying to preempt and counter idiotic comments like ashmac's!
YouDontWantToKnow
23 Feb 162#7
hot
haritori
23 Feb 163#8
"It's not 3d, it's probably made by Goodmans, it's not 1000hz, it's not a plasma, it's lag is probably bad for gaming, there's not a lot of 4k content... Etc etc...
But £250 for a 43"UHD 4k smart TV seems pretty good to me!"
Really? why would anyone pay anything for a sub par TV? i think i'd rather invest that £250.00 in a nice Samsung 1080p set.
That's smaller. More expensive. And not smart.
I wanted +40"
And I wanted smart.
It's for my bedroom.
The reviews are great so it can't be that bad.
And I'm disillusioned with Samsung at the moment. Spent £1600 2 and a half years ago on 55f8000 and there's a lot that annoys me about that TV.
secretspartan1 to haritori
24 Feb 161#34
No 43 inches, just 40 inches, ask any woman, those extra 3 inches make all the difference.
Carrie.F to haritori
24 Feb 16#88
The display is manufactured by Japan Display
in 2014...
Sony, Toshiba and Hitachi have signed agreements to set up a new company, Japan Display.
Guess where Samsung buy their mainstream displays :wink:
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
But £250 for a 43"UHD 4k smart TV seems pretty good to me!
>>>>>
The model is: 43HGT69U
Correct user guide for this TV in this deal:
http://www24.zippyshare.com/v/sEQVs3Eh/file.html
- 008
Top comments
All comments (228)
But £250 for a 43"UHD 4k smart TV seems pretty good to me!"
Really? why would anyone pay anything for a sub par TV? i think i'd rather invest that £250.00 in a nice Samsung 1080p set.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-UE32J5100-Full-1080p-Model/dp/B00VBUYHWU/ref=sr_1_fkmr3_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1456265510&sr=8-1-fkmr3&keywords=43+inch+tv+samsung+5100
I wanted +40"
And I wanted smart.
It's for my bedroom.
The reviews are great so it can't be that bad.
And I'm disillusioned with Samsung at the moment. Spent £1600 2 and a half years ago on 55f8000 and there's a lot that annoys me about that TV.
in 2014...
Sony, Toshiba and Hitachi have signed agreements to set up a new company, Japan Display.
Guess where Samsung buy their mainstream displays :wink: